THE CASE AGAINST MIKE GARRISON

UPDATE: consider this post under revision until further notice. If you have questions, ask.

The first thing you need to understand is that just because Mike Garrison wasn’t physically in the room during the October 15 decisional meeting, that in no way excuses him from responsibility. That’s tantamount to the president of a nation insisting he’s not responsible for the bombs dropped by his own military. It’s a conclusion supported by neither ethics or law.

The second thing is, it’s never the crimeit’s the cover up. Immediately after Mike Garrison’s most senior advisers agreed to falsify Heather Bresch’s transcript, the University issued a statement blaming the entire thing on her failure to pay a $50 graduation fee. It was a lie, and they knew it. And Mike Garrison went along with the whole thing.

Even if you consider everything in the light most favorable to Mike Garrison, he still bears ultimate responsibility for what happened. Even if Garrison really didn’t make the call — if he really wasn’t responsible for the “palpable pressure” and “prevailing sentiment” that Bresch should be granted the degree “if at all possible” — he was the man in charge. He knew exactly what happened in that meeting, and he approved all of it. He knew because his 3 closest and most highly paid advisers were there for him. They telephoned him right after the meeting to let him know exactly what happened. He knew what happened, he let it happen, and he approved the whole thing. Mike Garrison put his seal of approval on every single thing that happened in the decisional meeting.

And even if you consider everything in the light most favorable to the people in the decisional meeting — if you give them the complete benefit of the doubt about their intentions — what they did was so clearly wrong.

The President’s top advisers — Alex Macia, Craig Walker, and Bill Case — along with Lang, Sears, Logar, Blakely and Speaker — sat in a room and decided to give Heather Bresch credit for classes she never took, never attended, and never even paid for. They knew what they were doing. Heather was to receive full credit for work they knew she never did.

At one point in the meeting, Paul Speaker actually said that they were doing “the one thing they knew didn’t happen.” But they went ahead and did it anyway. And as they were finishing up, Alex Macia — Garrison’s right hand man since the Wise administration, and the direct extension Garrison’s power in that room — said “It looks like she completed the requirements … Does anyone have any problems with that?” No one objected. It was over. And within minutes, Mike Garrison knew about the whole thing, and signed off on it.

The man in charge said it was OK.

But here’s the thing — they knew what they did was wrong, just as much as you and I do. Which is why they told a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STORY to the press.

That same day, WVU spokeswoman Amy Neil was ready with the University’s official statement:

Based on verified university records, she has completed her degree. We went through records from 10 years ago to make sure all the credits were completed. We were able to verify that all the class work was completed. She did all 48 hours.”

She went on to explain that Bresch’s grades weren’t put on record because she neglected to pay a $50 graduation fee.

That, my friends, is a BALD FACE LIE. The University LIED, and they knew it. Mike Garrison knew that what they were telling the press wasn’t true. They found no records. The only records were the ones they were about to create. There was no verification that she completed class work — they were giving her credit for class work they knew she never did. And there was never a problem with a $50 dollar graduation fee. Heather Bresch’s grades weren’t on record because there were no grades.

Mike Garrison, the man in charge, knew about all this and he let it happen.

They took a chance.

They took a chance that they could blame the whole thing on a $50 dollar graduation fee, and that no one would be the wiser.

They lost.

And till this very day, Mike Garrison has never said who gave Amy Neil that statement. She sure as hell didn’t write it. Which is funny, because Mike Garrison can turn up 70 problem degrees going back 10 years in under 60 days — but he doesn’t care about who told Amy Neil to LIE TO THE PRESS AND THE PEOPLE OF WEST VIRGINIA about Heather Bresch’s degree.

*******************

Even if Heather Bresch really did take those classes and the records really were lost (something we know didn’t happen), and they gave her grades without consulting her professors, that would be bad enough. But what happened was far worse. They made up grades for classes they knew she didn’t take, or even paid for. And Mike Garrison said it was OK.

Even if Garrison’s administration were to have told Amy Neil to tell the press “we discover what happened — she had a ‘life credit’ arrangement with Professor Speaker, but never followed up on it. The grades were never assigned, but we have them now.” — that would have been terrible. A complete mess. But what they did was even worse. They tried to cover it up. And Mike Garrison said it was OK.

And even if Mike Garrison had no idea of the misdeeds that went on under his watch on October 15 — the falsifying of Heather Bresch’s transcript; the LIES told to the media to cover it up — that means Mike Garrison is utterly and totally incompetent. In which case the Board of Governors is DUTY BOUND to fire him, and begin the search for a new President.

355 Responses to “THE CASE AGAINST MIKE GARRISON”

  1. inthetrenches Says:

    I hope this entire entry will be read to the BOG on Friday in the public part of the meeting. It is succinct and devastating to last week’s statement that there’s “no evidence.” What’s written here, sadly, is no “surprise witness” that shows up at the end of a Perry Mason episode; it is the set of dots that, when connected, represent the cae against Garrison and his administration. A case that would be immoral and unethical to ignore by anyone with power to do something about it.

  2. Lou Says:

    Thursday’s To Do List

    1. Email BOG members. Addresses are available at http://garrisonmustgo.com/?page_id=54

    2. Email or call Governor Manchin telling him not to reappoint Farmer and Wells to WVU BOG (governor@WVGov.org or 1-888-438-2731). Suggest alternatives such as Charles Vest, Henry Louis Gates, George Bennett, Ray Lane, John Chambers, etc.

    3. Sign the MIR petition at http://www.wvumir.org/ if you haven’t already done so. Send a contribution to MIR at the WVU Credit Union, 448 Harding Ave, Morgantown, WV, 26505 to help pay for the full page ad in today’s Dominion Post.

  3. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    Amen, HK. That is almost verbatim what I told Mike Garrison when I met with him.

  4. Solution to Mikey's problem Says:

    Lou, it is my understanding that the ad in the DP is already paid for…this was just stated on Channel 12. Perhaps you should rephrase that…

  5. Lou Says:

    Yes, I just read the bottom line of the ad and saw that. Sorry. But, I would still encourage people to send money to MIR to support their activities.

  6. Solution to Mikey's problem Says:

    The name of the person who paid for the ad is published in the front page story. You can bet the Garrison people will try to discredit him.

  7. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    Here is a copy of the appeal I made to two of the WVU Board of Governors’ members: Sally Smith and Ellen Cappellanti.

    I have received no response from them, but I figure my e-mail had an impact.

    Perhaps they read this blog and other members of the WVU BOG do, too. I am appealing from my status as a Rotary Ambassadorial Scholar.

    This was in addition to my letter to the WVU BOG as a whole, which ran in part as a letter to the editor in “The Dominion Post” yesterday.

    Dear Ms. Cappellanti:

    I sent this same e-mail to fellow WVU Board of Governors member Sally Smith. I think it applies to you, too. I did a bit of research on you before sending this e-mail–do not hold that against me.

    Your membership in the Vandalia Rotary Club is a valuable asset. I am sure you will realize how close I am to Rotary as this year’s Ambassadorial Scholar for District 7530 and as a Paul Harris Fellow. Yet, more importantly, your connection to Rotary proves to me that you are an honorable person, well-versed in what is ethical and moral.

    Perhaps the Board might consider applying the Four Way Test:

    Of the things we think, say or do
    Is it the TRUTH?
    Is it FAIR to all concerned?
    Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIPS?
    Will it be BENEFICIAL to all concerned?

    In the Heather Bresch matter and President Michael Garrison’s continuation as the head of WVU, it does not look good when I apply the test. I hope you feel the same way.

    This is an unmitigated disaster for WVU.

    Truly, if you are being pressured by certain people on the Board, I hope that you will take a stand. I will be there to support you, as will most of West Virginia. Indeed, my friends have received veiled threats from people on the Board. I have yet to receive one, but I figure it will be coming soon.

    I will tell you this: I will not be frightened out of my university and my state because of a couple hacks. You should not either, if that is the case. Remain steadfast in the faith that there is something better here in the state. Your resolve is refreshing.

    I remember when I went to the student forums for President Garrison’s hiring. Board members were there and told me face-to-face who they supported. They are still occupying the Board, and, no doubt, refuse to budge on their opinion.

    Moreover, someone asked me “If I was there to raise some hell” to which I responded, “Of course, I am required to ask the tough questions based on my conscience.” That person responded, “Well, that’s just how it works in this state” and I replied “Maybe it shouldn’t.” That is a precarious position to combat, as I figure you are in a similar one now.

    Sincerely,

    Joshua Austin
    WVU Class of 2008
    Order of Augusta

  8. Gullible Says:

    I praise everyone who is stepping forward to make a stand against Garrison today. I’m proud of you.

    I, however, remain on the sidelines — one of the silent majority who knows you are correct. We want to join you. We know Garrison must go — but we are afraid.

    I swoop in once a week to teach a class at WVU. I don’t care if my contract is not renewed. I teach because I enjoy the experience. I don’t need the money.

    But my wife is a WVU employee who is not protected by tenure or years of seniority. She loves her work. She is not well paid, but her work is a big part of her. I don’t dare speak out because I fear funding for her position would suddenly dry up. Again, it’s not the money. I just don’t want to see her go through emotional trauma. So I keep my mouth shut (except for a few anonymous posts).

    Thanks to those of you brave enough to speak out. I suspect you’re putting yourselves or your family at risk by doing so.

  9. BBER Says:

    HK–Great tracking of the story with one exception. You write:

    “The President’s top advisers — Alex Macia, Craig Walker, and Bill Case — along with Lang, Sears, Logar, Blakely and Speaker — sat in a room and made up grades for classes Heather Bresch never took, and never paid for. Grades for classes THEY KNEW she didn’t take, or even register for — much less complete. She admitted this to them. They knew what they were doing. But yet these 8 men sat in that room and gave her full credit for work she never did. They pulled grades “out of thin air” and added them, one by one, to her transcript.”

    Go back and look at the first FOIA material and you will see that the grades did not come from that day. Those were the work over the following week by Lang, Sears, Logar, and Blakely. It took them a week to falsify the transcript before they were willing to issue the degree.

  10. Steph Says:

    Mr. & Mrs. Gullible:

    You are a part of a very large group, as am I. In time, we all get to vote, where secrecy is a right. Keep that in mind. It’s OK to be on the sidelines, and if you believe in the cause, you’ll find a way to help and tell the truth.

    Some of us actually returned to the academic environment to escape the corporate-style retaliation that is going on now. That’s why integrity is so important - if it is sacrificed to greed at WVU - where will it thrive?

    Honorable people learned that small honorable deeds build honorable character. When it’s absent - you have individuals driven by personal gain. When dishonorable people band together and create an infrastructure of self-preservation - it’s pretty ugly. Let’s hope integrity does not become like a secretly practiced religion, in the catacombs.

    I don’t think anyone can fault you. Others like you will benefit knowing they are not alone.

  11. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    Steph: Here, here. I agree whole-heartedly. I have had multiple people from ALL walks of life–including some surprising areas–ask how they can help in this situation. They contacted me. We have support on EVERY level of this situation, and we will win if we can stay on message with the facts.

    Continue to support the alumni, faculty, staff and, most importantly, the students.

    Sincerly,

    Joshua Austin

  12. wvchucklehead Says:

    Thanks, HK, for putting this so clearly; for connecting the dots.

    I would only add that, to me, the issue has always been this:

    Mike Garrison KNEW, by his own admission to Bray Cary during the televised interview, that Heather Bresch had not been in those classes, had been out of state even. Therefore, he KNEW, that the grades had to be phony and therefore he allowed the official position of the University to be an outright LIE

    That disqualifies him for the Presidency of ANY University. He has PERSONAL culpability. Let alone that he, as the CEO, should be responsible for what his subordinates do, as has been well-said by the 5 Distinguished Alumni.

  13. Steph Says:

    wvchucklehead:

    is there something you can post on this interview? It’s getting very hard to keep up. Date?

    Not that I need further convincing, but I do enjoy seeing statements first hand.

    Who said “If you always tell the truth, you’ll never have to remember if you lied?” I probably butchered something famous - hey “undercover” - help me.

  14. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    Put the bastards under oath. Make them tell us what went on when faced with perjury charges.

    Wanna bet that more people than those at Stewart Hall had a hand in this sad, sordid mess?

  15. Steph Says:

    I’d bet money on that, lurking!

    If McClellan can survive his tell-all, let’s hope we have a few in WV who will take a peak, not see their shadow, and start jump in. The press is salivating for you now!

  16. Steph Says:

    wvchucklehead:

    I think this is the link to your interview

    http://www.wowktv.com/story.cfm?func=viewstory&storyid=38108

    While I’d love to read the resounding truth once again in print, I cannot bring myself to sit here and view this! After work, perhaps. But maybe you can share with us which section is the most incriminating.

  17. 70s Grad Says:

    Can someone post a link to the DP ad and story, please? For those of us out of state and without subscriptions, it is not accessible. If you can help, thanks!

  18. Snarky Says:

    Steph, I heard Judge Judy say something along the lines of if you tell the truth you don’t have to remember your lies. But perhaps she paraphrased from a more notable source. :)

  19. Ann Says:

    70s grad, links to the DP articles and letters are near the bottom of the HEATHER BRESCH WAS MIKE GARRISON’S BOSS blog. I believe Steph posted them very early.

  20. Steph Says:

    D-P was posted today on another thread. Go look - I can’t remember!

    probably whatever precedes todays

  21. LaReina Says:

    HK, bravo. This essay should be put in the form of a letter to the editor and sent to every newspaper in the state - especially those owned by Ogden (Ogden Newspapers = Bill Nutting, BOG member and Ogden Nutting, big WVU donor).

  22. Me, too... Says:

    Thanks, Gullible, for writing what I feel. If there really was an atmosphere of free speech here, I wouldn ‘t feel the need to stay anonymous right now.
    I love my work, and I do it well, and I keep doing it every day in spite of Garrison, Manchin, and all the Good Old Boy thugs who have taken the honor and respect from this University. I am sickened and angered by their actions–even more so every day this is unresolved. I feel like there is a game of chicken going on–and the powers that be are willing to stay in the game until the train hits us all…
    Thank you, HK, and everyone here, for your loyalty to the honor of WVU.

  23. Steph Says:

    Tell the truth/don’t remember your lies

    perhaps this is it - Mark Twain

    http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Mark_Twain/31

  24. Steph Says:

    maybe this sentiment is one for the ages, no doubt even more ancient than it seems -

    Son, always tell the truth. Then you’ll never have to remember what you said the last time.
    Sam Rayburn (1882 - 1961), quoted Washingtonian, November 1978

    bye for now

  25. BHO Says:

    As usual, lurking cuts straight to the bone, er, chase.

    The soft underbelly of the cover-up is Neil. Who told her $50? And then who told her about these record-problems in the transition from a paper trail to an electronic trail. (Is that one is supposed to have traction because of these 70 bogus degrees MG and his “associates” claim to have uncovered? Hmmm…cover-up of the cover-up?)

    Another “soft underbelly” seems to belong to Logar. I say that because of the way he fingered Macia. (See the superb Huntington newspaper editorial linked here elsewhere yesterday, the editorial with the mug shot, er, head shot of Macia.)

  26. Left Shadow Says:

    HK — great summary.

    Today’s PPG article (http://www.postgazette.com/pg/08157/887551-298.stm) and related BOG summary (http://www.post-gazette.com/images4/20080609WVU_board_governors.pdf) attempts to move the focus to Manchin. Big pics of lord Joe, his daughter the princess and MG followed by pics and affiliations of BOG members. If only all the WV media outlets would do the same these people would grow tired of seeing their pictures in the paper for all the wrong reasons.

  27. BHO Says:

    If I were Neil and Logar and wanted to sleep peacefully at night, I’d not amuse myself by watching “Silkwood”.

    Now, that’s an exaggeration, but, if I were Logar and Neil, I’d be glancing over my shoulder.

    If this thing ever comes to sworn testimony, the two areas of inquiry most likely to start unraveling the cover-up ball of yarn have to do with Neil’s statements in October and who broke the law by physically changing the grades on Bresch’s transcript.

  28. fox hunter Says:

    To all the gullibles:
    I understand your fear and your beliefs about your vulnerability. As Steph states, you will get a chance to cast a secret vote in Nov. That being said, I have publicly stated my opinions and have not (yet?) been threatened, persecuted etc. I encourage you to cross the line of secrecy and silence and join those who have already signed the MIR petition.
    http://www.wvumir.org/

  29. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    We have a second questions before as well.

    MG has done the people pf WV a wonderful service. He has failed to properly man the ramparts of Fort Good Ole Boy, and I am being quite candid here. This inept leadership of Garrison/Macia/Goodwin has allowed us a glimpse through the crack of secrecy at a internecine war between what is right and what is being done. This is just the very tip of corrupt dealings and relationships that have been SOP at WVU for years.

    How many of us are willing to continue to ask, to question, to demand accountability of WVU leaders (and WV leaders) when this “crisis”subsides?

    Do you not think that when MG is thrown overboard, that it will have less to do with what is right than how to go back to business as usual?

    How many of us are going to find the strength and courage to not accept a “sacrifice” to appease the masses?

    When MG goes, do we high five, knuckle-slap, pat each other on the back-fall prey to the hubris of victory or realize that this is just the first salvo in asking our leaders to do whats right and proper…in all matters.

  30. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    Yes, Fox, I agree that there is strength in numbers. I have not been threatened directly since all this came out. Doubt that I will–neither will anyone that comes forward. That would be the death knell for the whole group of Garrison supporters.

  31. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    MG is a liability to those that want to “do business”. He is bringing calls for transparency and that doesn’t sit well with most players in this incestous affair. And we get mad at Cheney for making a joke about ir when we tolerate this crap ! Hell, maybe we deserve the ridicule!

    Manchin has got to let MG go by Friday. If he is going to support the candidate of Change, he has to Change!! When he was supporting Clinton, her baggage evened out Manchin’s baggage. It’s a different set of rules on Friday Joe!!
    The new Boss wants Change!!

    (posted in another thread)

  32. Otto Says:

    There is a story in the State Journal today that, amongst other things, addresses how MG’s failure to lead is impacting fund raising.

    http://www.statejournal.com/story.cfm?func=viewstory&storyid=39522

  33. BHO Says:

    Lurk. You’re analysis of Clinton versus the New Boss vis a vis the Dem leadership establishment in the state is correct, I believe.

    This, too, is heartening in that regard: I do not believe WV will be part of the New Boss’s true and baseline, hardcore electoral strategy this fall.

    That could change of course, but it’s unlikely to see how it would, at this point, anyway.

    That means the New Boss will not owe anything to people who weren’t bold enough to assert themselves on his behalf as superdelegates by or (better yet before) June 3.

  34. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    BHO,

    I agree with you concerning the state’s status of New Boss’s base or not. But as the WV Dem leadership lines up for “handouts”, it seems to me that they had better be shopping from the same tailor as the New Boss. Better to jettison ballast in June than to have to explain it in October. IMHO

  35. Molly's Mom Says:

    This is a good day. The press coverage keeps the pressure on, and the numbers of folks who want to return to “peaceful” days are growing. Even the good ole boys are feeling pressure. Let’s hope it’s enough for tomorrow’s Board of Governors to “do the right thing.”

    The donor issue is a big one. The WVU Foundation has to be fearful that it cannot fulfill its mission. And that pressure will be felt by the BOG.

    The article discounting the Distinguished Alums letter this week was not helpful to Garrison.

  36. Mark PGH Says:

    Molly’s Mom….which article is that? Do you have a link?

  37. Dumas Hick Says:

    A lot of Astroturfing going on in the comments to this op-ed today. I am the only supporter of the op ed so far. The other posts are claiming that the critics haven’t really read the panel’s report, that the faculty are engaging in spin to protect Lang and Sears and to force out Garrison, etc. If anyone here has anything to say, I encourage you to post a comment to this op ed:

    http://wvgazette.com/Opinion/Op-EdCommentaries/200806040738

  38. BBER Says:

    BHO,

    Logar will never sleep at night; neither will Sears, Walker, Case, Lang, or Blakely.

    Go to http://www.post-gazette.com/downloads/20080111wvu_bresch_email.pdf and reread the October 19 email. Sears tells Walker and Case:

    “I met with Provost Lang this morning about this whole issue. He and I feel it is better for us in the college to complete the transcript first and then send back the letter along with the completed transcript and other supporting materials. I have the grad programs and Associate Dean Logar working on the transcript matters, and we believe that we can have everything completed on Monday.

  39. inthetrenches Says:

    Any chance that someone with all the pieces lined up could craft a timeline of who did what to whome, when, and what was actually said/put on record? A timeline would shed great light on this. And this blog seems like the best place to hunt a Woodward or Bernstein for the cause.

  40. BOG dinner tonight Says:

    Is the BOG dinner at Sunrise Mansion (Farmer’s law office) still on for tonight? Think you need to have a visible presence with signs that say FIRE MG! as close as you can get. Wear masks if you need to. Or at least spray paint some big signs or bedsheets and place them up the carriage trail or up the road to Sunrise. Call the press and alert them to cover it. YOU NEEED TO VISIBLY REGISTER TO THE BOG’S TONIGHT before the meeting tommow. They need to see more than letters and emails. And keep up the pressure tomorrow. They need to see this on the news tonight in the morning. Some of them are still in a bubble world. I can’t do this, too close to some of them.

  41. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    BOG:

    I have sent my e-mails and posted them here. Hopefully, I have reached some of them.

  42. High Cotton Says:

    in the trenches:

    Post Gazette has a timeline, etc. on their website. it was up to date as of a few weeks ago.

  43. Steph Says:

    Lurking:

    Regarding only WVU, once a decision to be rid of MG is made, a void will not be permitted. New Senate chair, MIR, or anyone else cannot force BOG to change right now. Because we rarely hear from them, we picture them hiding from our emails. What about conference calls and meetings that preclude the already secret executive sessions? Don’t kid yourself. If leadership changes quickly - the reaction from all sides for “back to business as usual,” as you said, would be very strong. N’est pas?

    Even the best of outcomes for WVU right now will not prevent years of retaliation. I’ve seen it, and at its most insidious, there is nothing legal that can be done. I’d even watch out for set ups from students, put up to all sorts of things. These are terrible thoughts, but truly, I’ve seen it.

    As I skimmed the quotations today, it was Lenin who said “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.” The best thing everyone can do is maintain the vigilance when the danger seems past.

  44. Joshua fax/phone them Says:

    Especially Sally and Ellen. Leave voice mail saying what you said. Call their personal secretaries and make sure they get the fax. Nice Letter, good approach, thanks, Another Rotarian

  45. Joe P Says:

    QUOTED FROM LURKING:

    …Do you not think that when MG is thrown overboard, that it will have less to do with what is right than how to go back to business as usual?

    …When MG goes, do we high five, knuckle-slap, pat each other on the back-fall prey to the hubris of victory or realize that this is just the first salvo in asking our leaders to do whats right and proper…in all matters.

    =========

    Lurking has a point.

    Puskar, Petropolis, and Goodwin have been calling alot of the shots in the age of Manchin. They control all the so-called pro-business PACs, and the left has been satiated with winning control of the House Dem caucus. This group gained additional strength in 2006 when the racetrack operators joined the ruling coalition.

    No one has enjoyed the control over the state’s political system that Joe enjoys now. You will notice that aside from Blankenship’s efforts in 2006, very little political money has flowed into legislative races without Mojo’s blessing.

  46. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    Steph,

    That’s the point of my post. Vigilance cannot operate in a vacuum. The courage that has been shown-the willingness to demand truth and accountability must be maintained.

    There may exist an illusion that retaliation will pass. That simply will not be the case!! The commitment to transparency must be a loud voice!! The faculty must demand a HIGHER edgree of integrity of their own, Land, Sear et all than perhaps even from MG.

    The demand for truth,integrity and transparency must be an heraldic symbol and not a logo.

  47. inthetrenches Says:

    High Cotton:

    Thanks for the tip about the timeline, dated April 24. It doesn’t contain the “no confidence/throw the bum out” votes, or things like Garrison’s claim to interviewer(s) that he still wasn’t sure whether HB earned the degree. If Post-Gazetteers (love that word) are reading this, it might be a good time to run an extended timeline.

  48. Steph Says:

    inthetrenches: Their own words and the timeline tell the story. So much documentation is the cause of the “move on” sentiments. The simplest and most verifiable version is there, but someone has to wade through and compile it. It’s fairly complete but not enough.

    lurking: we have to become an obsessive, vigilant, obnoxious department of Homeland Security. Leave your lies in the bin and go through the detectors! Off with the shoes and metal objects - only integrity is allowed to pass.

    How far will this go? I don’t know. I don’t know how broad I can maintain beyond WVU’s crisis. I know what has kept me out of the trenches before, and could do so again. Sometimes it’s just subsistence. But it gets down to each one. But for now, it’s good to be among many.

  49. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    No Steph!! Do not deny freedom !! Just the opposite- demand that freedom be respected!! Public service is a noble endeavor and should not be stunted by back door deals, personal favors, special interests (BOG members). Simplify the process…DO WHAT”S RIGHT!! But accept responsibility that if lies and wrong doings pass; that we bear the responsibility for letting it happen. We should not be surprised that unscrupulous people do unscrupulous deeds.

    No more ponzi schemes on how to make this state an attractive place to do business. Operate on the simple principles of fairness, equal protection, integrity, truthfulness. People do not want to stay in places that have no assurances of said. People flee, leaving only the bottom-feeders, bullies and opportunists.

    My fear is that this “battle” becomes just that- a battle and not kept within the context of “waging the war of ideals”.

    Being among many? That starts with the efforts of one…

  50. poliscigeek Says:

    HK - well done on the summary. How can the BOG possibly ignore the facts and the timeline? And that Garrison was at the heart of every decision taken to award Bresch the degree. I have been saying all along that all the President’s men acted with his full knowledge and support. To say otherwise would be an indictment of his ability to manage (not) his staff. And yet another reason for his dismissal. He loses either way. The only way he could have won was to have told the truth to Heather (remember her daddy said she would have acccepted the truth even though she would not have liked it), to the people of WV whose tax dollars support the institution and to the students, alumni and the faculty and staff of WVU who have paid to attend or work for the university with the promise of academic and professional integrity .

  51. Sue Says:

    Here is an interesting article from Inside Higher Ed concerning the behavior of the WVU registrar at the beginning of the scandal.

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/05/degree

  52. wvu 90's grad Says:

    Mountaineers for a New Administration, please let us know if we can help contribute to the cost of that full page ad in the Dominion Post. It was great!

    Steph-thanks so much for posting all of the links to the DP articles. It’s very helpful and it gives me encouragement to see all of that anti-Garrison sentiment.

    In my humble opinion it seems like the BOG has to ask Garrison to resign at their meeting but I thought that last week. A few have commented in the past that Goodwin is probably relieved at the timing on this because it is summer. If you ask me, I think that is a disadvantage. From what I’ve seen momentum has only grown and will continue to do so and you’ve got a group of very creative, intelligent people who might have a little more time on their hands with summer, not that they aren’t busy people. Let’s all hope that the BOG does the right thing but if not let’s keep the momentum. Thank you to everyone who is trying to bring back honor to our great university!

  53. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    I am calling all the BOG’s offices now. Leaving voicemails.

  54. poliscigeek Says:

    All I can say is “Thank God for the independents who were added to the investigative panel as a result of the faculty senate demand”. Otherwise, the degree would have been awarded and no one would have been the wiser. And the sad state of affairs at WVU would have continued.

  55. MNA guy Says:

    wvu 90’s grad: Mountaineers for a New Administration had nothing to do with that wonderful ad in the DP today. Thanks for your generosity, though - we may call on you for future help.

  56. Steph Says:

    SUE: Great link. The last sentence says it all! Very interesting article.

    WVU 90’s Grad: I will continue to post D-P since local coverage is important for distant bloggers to stay connected.

    LURKING: I did not mean to deny freedom, but per SUE’s link, someone being vigilant eventually has to say “no.” I certainly agree that a war of ideas/ideals is merely in its ebb and flow, and a crack in the armor has resulted in a unified response.

    You have been vigilant about all this much longer than I, so keep those insights coming.

    BBER: I’m thinking, according to these emails you posted, that the Macia presence could have been an ambush. Nothing in these mails indicates legal councel would be needed. Walker is the only nonacademic involved.

    I can’t help but feel that this HK blog could have prevented a lot of retaliation already. I wish I had time to really process things more thoroughly - alas. duty calls

  57. Johnny Quest Says:

    Anybody contact “60 Minutes” or “Nightline” yet?

  58. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    Amazing…no one has answered my phone call yet.

  59. wvu 90's grad Says:

    Sorry for the confusion about the ad! Thank you to the person/persons who placed it.

  60. Mteerfish Says:

    In re Sue’s post about the article at higher ed. simple question for BOG and MR. Garrison, what about this situation required his or anyone other than the registrar’s involvment? obvious answer I know, but someone should have to address that on the record.

    My experience at WVU was that I would have to physically pound the pavement and do all my own leg work to get a problem with grades etc. resolved. Damn I got a C in a grad. history course didn’tt finish my masters. I contacted the history dept last year about completeing my degree and was told I had to start over, even though i had more than enough credits. dumb me i didn’t think to call the President of the University.
    Fortunately i have other degrees by which I earn a living.

  61. StevieRay Says:

    I have followed postings here for a while but this is the first I’ve shared. First off, I sense that the tide has changed. The question will be whether or not the BOG will see it. How can you stand on the shore and not perceive it? You don’t look, that’s how… People tend to seek support, affirmation, and rationale for their decisions – not opposition, to a point. The point has come when the BOG has to face what is now clearly inevitable to most.

    On another note, I’m a graduate program director at WVU. The notion that system changes are in order and that additional audits are necessary is, as many of you have already stated, a diversion from the context that led us to this. I agree. There are numerous checks and balances in place today for program graduation. Students apply to graduate, their records are checked (“audited” already in a sense) at the program and College level, and any variations must be resolved. What variations emerge? Minor – I can say first hand – and probably about 10%. Funny – that number keeps coming up. Here are the common variations I see:

    Transfer credits from other institutions must be approved by advisor and department oversight. Sometimes a “transient” permission form is missing even if approval took place. So the program supplies the missing paperwork if needed and appropriate.
    Incomplete grades turn up occasionally. The instructor may have neglected to change a grade for work that was completed. In any case, incompletes must be resolved. Changes in grade require 3-person approval. This is University wide. On the appropriate form, the instructor changes the grade and states a reason for the grade. The form must also be signed by the department chairperson (or designee) and the college dean (or designee).
    Course substitutions (including independent studies) sometimes take place with advisor or program permission. These variations may be questioned from time to time during the application review, usually to confirm the exact substitution.
    Sometimes a student will be short the required number of hours. When this happens, the student does not graduate until the shortfall is resolved. The only time I can think of when a student might graduate short on hours would be if the institution made a serious mistake somehow. Even then, the question would focus on a very limited number of hours.

    It will be interesting to see the types of variations present in the supposed 10% reported last week. I predict these were minor variations and effectively dealt with by the program at the time.

  62. Ann Says:

    Question: Since WVU Staff Council has decided staff will not to take a stand on the Garrison issue, shouldn’t Paul Martinelli, BOG staff representative, decline to vote on the matter?

    And since faculty has voted no confidence, shouldn’t their representative vote on their behalf?

  63. WVU Grad Says:

    Please, Garrison is a symptom of the corruption of our government by the special interest called Big Pharma. It is that simple. The arrogance represented by the WVU Board of Governors is an extension of the problem called corupt influence. We are fortunate that this scandal involves the Governor, his Big Pharma benefactor and their lap dogs. There can no longer be any doubt why we do not have affordable health care in this state. Take the blinders off and Privatize Joe this November. There is only one way to go to restore integrity to this state. King coals lap dog did not survive the democratic process, Big Pharma’s lap dog needs to be the next 2008 accountability project. Otherwise stop complaining.

  64. Pippi Longstocking Says:

    This was just posted to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette website:

    WVU law faculty calls for president’s resignation
    Thursday, June 05, 2008
    By Len Boselovic and Patricia Sabatini, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

    A majority of the tenured faculty of West Virginia University’s law school today called for the resignation of WVU President Mike Garrison, saying he has lost the battle of public opinion.

    The faculty members made the statement in letters sent to Mr. Garrison and the university’s board of governors after Mr. Garrison canceled a meeting with the faculty scheduled for today. The letters were signed by 11 of the 15 tenured professors at the law school, whose graduates include Mr. Garrison.

    “We all truly believe that it is in the best interests of the law school, the university and the state that Garrison resign,” said Valorie K. Vojdik, one of the professors.

    The other signers include Robert M. Bastress, who failed in his bid to win a seat on the state Supreme Court in last month’s primary election, and Gerald G. Ashdown, the husband of Monongalia County prosecutor Marcia Ashdown.

    Faculty members said Mr. Garrison has “lost the battle for public opinion” because of the involvement of his top aides in a decision to award an M.B.A. degree to Mylan Inc. executive Heather Bresch that she did not earn. Ms. Bresch is the daughter of West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin and a long-time friend and former business associate of Mr. Garrison.

    Their letters come a day before WVU’s board of governors meets in Charleston. The board issued a statement in support of Mr. Garrison at a meeting Friday.

  65. Thanks Joshua Says:

    Maybe you will inspire each BOG to remember that s/he was once like you. Full of promise and ethics. Maybe some of them will turn back to the light side of the force. The others, we’ll have to battle.

  66. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    Got to speak with four BOG members. Looks like they see through all the nonsense. I think we might see some action tomorrow.

    Pray for WVU’s salvation tomorrow with the ousting of Mike Garrison.

    Let’s go Mountaineers!!!

  67. be polite but call them Says:

    They are answering their phones today for a reason. Usually you can never get them on first call. Or even one of their secretaries. They are listening to the voice(s) of the people, for once. Call them, be polite. Make your case. Give them ammo to off MG. Thank them for their time.

  68. R Says:

    I continue to be optimistic. The tide of public opinion is very powerful.

    I note that Ron Justice continues to claim over 1700 signatures on his pro-Garrison petition.

    Why is the media reporting this incorrect number (most recently Pam Kasey’s article)? The online petition that I accessed included 322 signatories, most Fairmont natives and “personal friends” of Mike.

  69. Sick'o the Corruption Says:

    Way to go HK for leading the people toward the promised land of truth and the all too frequently absent practice of accountability. What I read here is the people are tired of being lied to, cheated and made fun of and we should be. The bloggers here and HK have nailed it, the problem goes all the way to the top. Garrison and the BOG are small fry in a sea of corruption.

    We can’t wait for Manchin to be voted out, everybody in the state needs to join together and form militant unions to fight back against the health profiteers who obviously could care less about what people think while corrupting our public offices. The UMWA did it 100 years ago and we can do it again today. WVU Grad is correct in that we better do something, it is obvious “the powers that be” are doing what they want regardless of public opinion.

    The WV Media empire is in on the scam of the century, Oh Blame Garrison - not the Mylan Manchin gang. The media makes as much money off Big Pharma advertising as Big Pharma makes pushing their drugs on us, treating us like sheep. The media is not to be trusted any more than silver spoon politicians and their political hacks.

    HK and the PPG reporters deserve a large amount of credit for trying to present the truth in this age of corruption. We appreciate it.

  70. Otto Says:

    Why would he cancel a scheduled meeting with the law school faculty? Surely that is telling.

  71. Undercover Says:

    Ann at 12:29 asked “And since faculty has voted no confidence, shouldn’t their representative vote on their behalf?”

    You’d think so wouldn’t you? But Steve Kite has not, and will not. He has said the BOG doesn’t take votes, they work by reaching consensus. The problem is that when you reach a consensus with weasels, you look like a weasel yourself.

  72. Otto Says:

    HK: all of your links on the right hand side of the page seem to have disappeared. I was inclined to give some support, but even your link to ‘donate’ from yesterdays thread gives an error.

  73. Hippie Killer Says:

    It’s working for me right now. I’ll look into it.

  74. Also An Alum Says:

    Anyone have a full text copy of the Law School faculty’s letter to post here? I would be interested to see who signed.

  75. Mark PGH Says:

    I think the links only show up on the home page

  76. observer Says:

    I’m so thankful some of the CoL tenured faculty are speaking out. Also looking for the letter.

  77. Steph Says:

    http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/510321.html?nav=515

    Check out the Comments at the end of this, which is a rehash of the Cumming faux audit

    info from WVUF on donors reneging

  78. Steph Says:

    Pittsburgh Post Gazette has a PPG Scandal Article Chronology

    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08013/848514-28.stm

  79. MNA guy Says:

    WVU Alumni 2008, let me buy you a beer.

  80. Molly's Mom Says:

    The summer time plot to ignore this situation will backfire as long as folks keep up the contact with the media. This is turning from a faculty versus one of West Virginian’s finest young man battle into a more broad-based discussion.

    But the pressure must be kept up. It feels as if we are almost to the no-turning back point, but not quite. We still need 60 Minutes or Anderson Cooper attention, I”m afraid.

  81. conspiracy theorist Says:

    After speaking with 3 people who know and talk to BOG members, I’m now convinced that Garrison will resign tomorrow at the BOG meeting in Charleston.

    I know we’ve heard this rumor before, but this time, I’m convinced.

    Please remain skeptical … but chill the champagne.

    Of course, if they name some crud to be interim who is part of the party establishment … maybe just have a beer.

  82. Steph Says:

    http://www.wvmetronews.com/index.cfm?func=displayfullstory&storyid=24999

    It’s not the full letter, but I think this lists those who signed the CoL letter

  83. observer Says:

    Thank you, Steph. I cut and pasted the names here: “Gerald Ashdown, Robert Bastress, Charles DiSalvo, James Elkins, James Friedberg, Robert Lathrop, Patrick McGinley, James McLaughlin, Dale Olson, Judith Scully and Valorie Vojdik signed the letter.”

  84. Pippi Longstocking Says:

    Conspiracy and WVU Alumni 2008: I’ll be praying that you’re right and will have the champagne (and beer) ready!

  85. Steph Says:

    Thank you, observer.

    No doubt the AM papers pre-BOG will be powerful as well. I know of other letters to the editor that are simply backed up at the D-P.

  86. Steph Says:

    “Your action would be praised by those who now criticize you.”

    A quote from the CoL letter from the WVMetroNews report.

    I vote for “A deafening silence.”

  87. Undercover Says:

    We should help Garrison get a job somewhere far, far away. Then we need to see to it that Craig Walker goes with him - what a great team! And they can take Macia too. I leave it to B&E to figure out what to do with Sears et al. I sincerely hope Lang retires. Walker and Macia must never work for WVU, the Foundation, or the Athletic Dept. in any capacity.

  88. Mteerfish Says:

    thank you COL professors. You have done a great service to WVU, our state and our profession. I sincerely hope Mr. Garrison accepts your sound advice.

  89. Undercover Says:

    But don’t count your chickens, keep your powder dry, etc. Pick your favorite cliche for I’ll believe it when I see it.

  90. Somebody report tomorrow Says:

    Somebody give a play by play report of the goings on at tomorrow’s meeting for those of us who can’t go. Use the Embassy Suites business center if you have to. Perfectly legit.

  91. Snarky Says:

    Many thanks to the law school professors who spoke out. And I hope you all are right and that a resolution is at hand.

    Here’s part of the problem: Aside from a single professor, now retired, not ONE person I worked with in 20 years at WVU signed the MIR petition or showed up Monday for the student forum. Is it fear or apathy?

    WVU is bloated with political appointees who wormed their way in under Hardesty’s regime. These people have carte blanche to destroy lives and I’m not being dramatic. And if you think these folks feel shame or lose sleep over what they do, think again. WVU needs a complete housecleaning.

  92. enough is enough Says:

    While I appreciate the “Brain Drain” letter in today’s Dominion Post from Mark Brazaitis and Boyd Edwards–two of MIR’s strongest voices–because I’ve seen similar comments elsewhere (the best faculty and others will start leaving WVU) I want to make several points. We should all be careful not to suggest that those who don’t leave WVU are not somehow lacking in integrity or are being duped.

    The job market is very different for different disciplines, somewhat the reverse of the previous argument on this site about how the market drives salaries. Professors in some fields can easily move to other jobs while others (especially in the humanities) with stellar records will find it very difficult to move, even laterally. And of course some people with very strong credentials will stay at WVU because of family commitments.

  93. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    From Cappellanti in response to my earlier e-mail posted in this section:

    “I received your e-mail and your voicemail message. Trust me, I get it.
    I aprreciate your passion for our school.”

    Smith also replied:

    “Joshua, I did get your Mountaineer Creed message and appreciate your
    phone and E-mail communications.

    Thanks for your interest and loyalty to WVU.”

    Earlier e-mail from Smith read:

    “Joshua, Thank you for your thoughtful comments. I can see that you
    learned well your Journalism skills and wish you continued success
    should you pursue that degree or your Political Science education.

    Your CV is impressive. I’d like to hear more about your China trip
    should we have the opportunity to meet personally.

    We on the Board of Governors will consider your comments and those of
    all who have taken the time to share their thoughts related to the
    University that we love and which we proudly serve.”

    Received an e-mail from Steve Kite:

    “Joshua

    Sorry not to reply earlier, but I have been busy preparing to teach a capstone course in Montana next week.

    Thanks for your input.

    Steve”

    Received an e-mail from Jason Parsons:

    “Hi Josh. I did receive your email and your facebook message. I want you to know your voice and opinion matters to me. I have a great deal of respect for you and I value your opinion and that of all students I have heard from. That’s why I read every note encouraging me to support the president and that’s why I attended the student rally on Monday.

    Each voice matters and will matter as I discuss this issue at the Board meeting tomorrow. Remember you and I both love WVU and want what is best for it.
    Talk with you soon.

    Jason”

    Spoke to Martinelli on the phone–seemed pretty shocked about everything going on and is ready to move on. Did not say which way he would vote, neither did anyone else, for that matter. The staff are smart in that they realize with no faculty or students their positions will be the first ones cut. It is not purely an “academic matter” anymore, in my opinion.

    These are the response I have received so far. At the very least, these Board members wanted to hear what I had to say. That is certainly something. I left word with every other member I could contact, including Steve Goodwin. Doubt a reply will come from there.

    Keep the faith.

  94. observer Says:

    Snarky, I’m hearing that people who are staff, rather than tenured faculty, are afraid of retaliation.
    Also, both faculty and non-faculty have work to do — book deadlines, other work. I should be working right now. . .

  95. Booya! Says:

    Anyone remember back in July 2007 when the Dominion Post ran a very valid story about Garrrison’s connections to the Board of Governors and Steve Goodwin said this to reporter Eric Bowen? …

    “Your story is bullshit, and you can quote me on that. For you to continue to write this stuff is irresponsible.”

  96. jmbwvu Says:

    Don’t you people realize you are the ones making WVU and the state of WV look bad?! By constantly perpetuating the resigination of Garrison you keep this story alive.

    What a waste of money to take out an ad in the Dominion Post. Couldn’t that money be spent in a more positive manner such as promoting WVU or the state of WV? Every one of you screams about the political ties between a few people on the board and the Governor’s office. What about the political agenda of the Dominion Post, which is owned by a gun-toting hard core Republican who undoubtedly is not happy about wasting all that money on his unsuccessful campaign against Sen. Byrd. It’s not hard to notice that the headline every single day has something to do with this story. But noone wants to acknowledge THAT political agenda!!

    Let it go, he’s not going anywhere. And stop wasting money on smear campaigns, YOU are the ones tarnishing the brand/image of our University and wonderful State!!

  97. sissonville Says:

    Whats wrong with toting guns?

  98. Hippie Killer Says:

    jmbwvu needs to stick to the sports blogs.

  99. Anonymous Says:

    that is the response of a desparate person.

  100. sissonville Says:

    I kept waiting for jmb’s punchline, then realized “holy crap, he’s serious!”

  101. Snarky Says:

    True, Observer. I was staff and retaliation and bullying were ongoing (under Hardesty). I can’t imagine that has changed. I didn’t particularly expect people to show for the student forum. I added that to my comments as an afterthought.

    But signing a petition doesn’t take any time. I was in a union at WVU, so I thought maybe someone I knew might sign.

  102. fox hunter Says:

    Snarky: I saw lots of faculty & even someone from Stewart Hall at the student rally. Most of those who were at the rally also signed the MIR petition.

  103. WVU Alumni 2008 Says:

    JMB: I think you are protesting because you do not want your buddies in Stewart Hall to leave. I wish you well in life, and perhaps someday you will realize what actually happened here. WVU and West Virginia cannot stew in these corrupt political juices anymore.

    What happened was wrong, and it is time that be admitted–actually, far past time. These people have taken something near and dear to every true Mountaineers’ heart–and that is faith. Mine is still here, though. I have faith that a competent leader–someone who truly cares about this university–will come forth.

    WVU will be an institution immune to all sorts of political hacks. It is an institution of higher learning, not the stomping grounds or a halfway point to a political end.

    I wish Mike Garrison the best of luck in life, and I hope this does not severely impact his family. But it is time to move forward as an ACADEMIC institution and with INTEGRITY. A true Mountaineer and person loyal to WVU would never have had his or her ethics questioned. Garrison’s failures in leadership, along with Lang’s, will provide the fodder for many scholars in WVU’s leadership studies program–ironically enough, endowed by Mike Puskar.

    Good luck to you, too, JMBWVU.

  104. Pippi Longstocking Says:

    jmbwvu: The Dominion Post doesn’t preside over the hopes and dreams of thousands of dedicated students - WVU does. So the political agenda of WVU and the unethical actions of its administration are - and should be - of concern to many. Garrison and the BOG are hoping that we just let it go and walk away (as you suggest) so that everything can remain status quo. The faculty, students, alumni, and residents have had enough of status quo and are demanding change. Thankfully we live in America where we have the right to do so.

  105. observer Says:

    Snarky, I did sign (and I am still waiting to find if my services as an ill-paid sometime adjunct will no longer be needed — but that is a job you don’t do for the money). In some departments or schools, many people signed, in others, very few or no one. I’m not using a WVU computer — I’d worry otherwise.

  106. Walter Jockety Says:

    hey guys….this just off the wire per rotoworld:

    Homer Bailey-S- Reds Jun. 5 - 3:39 pm et

    Homer Bailey lost his season debut Thursday, allowing five runs — two earned — over 6 1/3 innings against the Phillies.

    Bailey managed just one strikeout and walked four, but limited the Phillies to four hits and was hurt by several defensive misplays behind him. He could emerge with NL-only value, but shaky control figures to keep him from having mixed-league value this season. ”

    I was hoping for a better outing….but with Bruce raking, we should be fine.

  107. Otto Says:

    Snarky

    I don’t know what part of the University you work in, but here is one young faculty member who came out to the rally. It appears that he also signed the MIR petition.

    http://www.wchstv.com/newsroom/eyewitness/0806/080602_4dd54dc9.shtml

  108. jmbwvu Says:

    Nothing wrong with toting guns, I was just making reference to his picture he used for his campaign with his gun on his shoulder.

    And I will stick to THE Sports Blog. Over there we are positive and aren’t trying to bring down the University. I don’t claim to know all the ins and outs of this Garrison story I’m just sick of the negative talk everywhere you look and if you’re team continues to apply the pressure you’re only going to make his supporters feel like they’re being attacked and they will oppose that even stronger with each call for his head.

    That scenario is not good for WVU or WV and you know it. Think about what’s best for the blue and gold, it’s not a public smear campaign of its President. My two cents. I’m done.

  109. Hippie Killer Says:

    Dear sir,

    How far does Mike Garrison have to stick his dick up your ass before you realize your being FUCKED?

    That’s one of the things Garrison and his crew banked on. That West Virginia is full of meatheads like this guy who are too damn dumb, and too damn tied up in a little boy’s game to realize that things like the sanctity of a degree matters.

    They were wrong.

    People aren’t withholding donations, and faculty aren’t leaving in droves because anything we say on this blog. They’re doing so because they don’t want to be associated with an incompetent disgrace like Mike Garrison.

  110. poster Says:

    jmbwvu:

    All the damage was already done last year. Bringing it to light isn’t making anything worse; it’s the only way that anything will ever be fixed.

    What’s so wrong with Garrison’s supporters feeling like they are being attacked? If you “claim to know all the ins and outs of this Garrison story”, then how can you claim that that is necessarily a bad thing? If you just don’t like negative talk, maybe you should go back to kindergarten instead of discussion University related issues.

    We welcome the astroturfing trolls though. Truly amusing.

  111. High Cotton Says:

    Hey JMBWVU, this gun toting Republican has had it with your politically incestuous Manchin Goodwin clan which is PERVASIVE across West Virginia. If it wasn’t for HK and other folks with sense of PATRIOTIC loyalty to this great state and our university, your bend over buddies would continue to drag us down, down down to the abyss of mediocrity under the guise of looking out for the common man, all the while patting themselves on the back and padding their wallets, straight from the trough of state revenue.

    It doesn’t matter to what political party you belong - integrity and honesty in an academic setting are sacred.

  112. Left Shadow Says:

    jmbwvu — crawl back into your hovel.

  113. jmbwvu Says:

    Mike Garrison isn’t screwing me one bit. As a matter of fact he is GOOD for business.

    And I won’t stoop to your level of swearing and name calling. THAT is what looks like a “little boy’s game”. I’m done with this blog, where it’s going is not what is was intended for.

  114. Trillium Tootsie Says:

    jmbwvu has a right to speak his mind on your blog, HK. I just hope he has some brain cells left after emptying it on these posts.

  115. sissonville Says:

    jmb must be in the paper shredding business

  116. Cobb Says:

    Christ, that guy’s like a caricature of himself. “By Gawd, I don’t claim to know nuthin bout nuthin, but all this nasty talk aint good fer recruitin’.”

  117. xcuseme Says:

    Please, jmbwvu before you hit that “submit” button, have your mother edit your message.

  118. BHO Says:

    # Lurking In The Grass Says:
    June 5, 2008 at 9:32 am

    BHO,

    I agree with you concerning the state’s status of New Boss’s base or not. But as the WV Dem leadership lines up for “handouts”, it seems to me that they had better be shopping from the same tailor as the New Boss. Better to jettison ballast in June than to have to explain it in October. IMHO

    I agree, though they haven’t yet strengthened their bargaining position. I’m not talking here about Rockefeller, Byrd, Rahall and Mollohan.

    They’ll offer total party support (like pissing upstorm in a tornado in WV for Hussein). So everyone knows that’s a practical joke but symbolic gesture in the direction of the Common Good.

    More practically still, the governor, the Goodwins et al will pony up some real money. Fact is, though, Barack’s already a fundraising machine. Overwhelmingly large part of it is from a large base of small donors.

    Clinton and the Nat’l Dem Party are gonna have to come crawling to him for some. At this point, anyway.

    What to watch for after the swearing-in ceremony of Holiday Waiting to Happen (that’s a witticism a caustic black street guy related to me a couple daze ago) wins it, is who gets the federal lawyer jobs.

    Normailly, the US Senators vet those appointments, especially since our Senators have in living memory been two influential Democrats.

  119. westvirginiagal Says:

    IMHO this is WAY bigger than Garrison.
    The problem is - as has been stated here - the political use of an institution of higher education for improper purposes.
    The problem is:
    1) the Governor’s way of doing business, the thugs he has surrounded himself with, and with the appointment of many people who have NO idea about higher education to the governing board.
    WVU’s BOG is not the only one suffering from this mis-use and mis-direction. That is some investigative journalism for another day….

    2) a legislature which wants to micro-manage higher education and has set up a system where the governor has to appoint more than TWENTY Boards of Governors! There is little hope for actual vetting of appointees even if the Governor intends to appoint qualifed people. (Which he does not.)

    3) a decapitated Higher Education Policy Commission which basically collects data and serves as the gopher for the above-mentioned micro-managing legislature.

    It is a shame.
    I was born in WV - but am SERIOUSLY wondering if this is the place to raise a child.
    Sad, sad, sad.

  120. Out of state alumna Says:

    TO: WVU Alumni 2008

    I have never written to this blog, although I have spoken out publicly in many ways as a former student body president. As a Rotarian I want to congratulate WVU ALUMNI 2008 for holding up the Rotary Four Way Test to the BOG members who are Rotarians. Thank you for living up to the ideals of Rotary. Hopefully others will as well.

    Unfortunately, this scandal has even become the joke at my Rotary Club as others have seen it in the national media. I can’t tell you how many times I have thought about the wording in the Four Way Test or the codes of conduct that corporate executives, students, administrators and every human being lives by - or are supposed to live by.

    I am so proud to see students like yourself taking a stand for ethics and moral integrity. You will go far in life with those core values. Always remember that WVU alumni open doors for WVU graduates. Never be afraid to ask for help in finding a job. Alumni have done it for us and we will continue to pay it forward. That is the Mountaineer Way. Best wishes for a successful career. And keep fighting the fight for WVU’s integrity.

  121. BHO Says:

    If Time or Newsweek were to do a chart called “Those Who Missed the Party” [ie, Dem uncommitted superdelegates], Manchin and Nick Casey will be right up there.

    Now, their comeback would be the party political sensitivity of Joe’s position as National Democrat Governors chair.

    But that’s B$.

    Joe could have stayed uncommitted, while Casey committed an act of conscience and broke for Obama despite the results of the WV primary.

    That would have been the smart move. The one they didn’t make.

  122. BHO Says:

    Today, Charlie Rangel and a bunch of others endorsed the New Boss. It got headlines. On TV.

    Joe and the National Democrat Gov’s “strategy” doesn’t seem to have amounted to much.

    BTW, today, June 5, is the 40th anniversary of Bobby Kennedy’s assassination.

    Good for you, Charlie.

  123. Raging Red Says:

    “I don’t claim to know all the ins and outs of this Garrison story”

    So we should listen to your opinion why exactly?

  124. Raging Red Says:

    And, hey BHO–go play on some other blog. This post isn’t about Clinton or Obama or superdelegates or the primary or blah blah blah.

  125. BHO Says:

    As to “missing the party”: a New Political Coalition is emerging. It’s based on several things, including long-term changing demographic factors.

    WV will “miss the party” in 2008 but be seated at the table in 2012, when the New Coalition is more fully formed.

  126. Snarky Says:

    Fox, yes, I saw many faculty at the forum. Good representation. Observer, I applaud you for taking a stand. I think you’ll be okay because of the numbers but it IS a risk. I also loved my work at WVU, despite low pay. It was politics I couldn’t handle.

    I imagine if you log onto this blog from a university computer, your name goes on the LIST for the guillotine in Stewart Hall. :)

  127. BHO Says:

    By the way, my initials are my own. They are not those of Barrack Hussein Obama.

    I’m an agent from the Machine World. My name is Bad Human Odor.

    When the systems of control break down, as they just about to do in WV, I’m sent in.

    In other words, Lurking–you’re right: Garrison’s gone, at some point. But they want him on, at least through the Rodriguez case. At least through testimony phases.

  128. BHO Says:

    Also, the Bad Human Odor: When it becomes a stench, I get summoned.

    And the stench from Morgantown, WV, these days…

  129. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    Nah BHO,

    He is gone tomorrow. He is no longer an assett to those that do business with WVU or to the political courtesans in the Manchin orbit.
    He, my dear friends has become a liability. There are larger piles of chips on the table and MG is a dirty dealer, and everyone knows it now.

  130. itwho Says:

    you know, this rumor about internet monitoring keeps coming up–I know (I think) that it’s legal, but man is that stupid! can anyone speak with any knowledge about whether this is actually occurring or not?

  131. BHO Says:

    Lurking, you’re analysis is brilliant. If they are smart, your scenario is exactly what comes down tomorrow.

    Or very, very soon thereafter.

    They’ll give him his Hillary (few) Days of Reflection…

    And then everyone moves on to the selection of the…Next Hardesty.

  132. BHO Says:

    lol: “your, not you’re”

  133. inthetrenches Says:

    Tomorrow is D-Day. Just a little historical perspective.

  134. BHO Says:

    June 5: Bobby’s Death.

    June 6: Normandy.

    Salute both.

  135. inthetrenches Says:

    June 5: RFK shot
    June 6: RFK passes

  136. BHO Says:

    Thank you inthetrenches for your historical perspective.

    I listed chronologically above.

  137. Lurking In The Grass Says:

    LOL…OK, earlier I was trying to make a point. I had no idea I was feeding trolls. My apologies to all.
    I understand there is a cold beer waiting for me on my deck….duty calls!!

  138. poster Says:

    D-Day was only the beginning of the end. It took a long hard fight to actually beat the enemy back to the point of full surrender. Lest we forget.

  139. Lou Says:

    A posting on the MIR discussion group indicates that BOG nominations may be sent to:

    Scott Cosco, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs
    Office of the Governor
    1900 Kanawha Blvd., E.
    Charleston, WV 25305
    Phone: 304-558-2000
    Toll free: 1-888-438-2731
    Fax: 304-342-7025

    If anyone has an email address for this person, please post it.

    Among the names that have been mentioned are Charles Vest, Henry Louis Gates, Paul Gates, George Bennett, Ray Lane, John Chambers. Add to this list.

    Remember, even if MG goes tomorrow — and let us pray that he does — the problem won’t be solved unless other changes are made. One of those changes is getting a BOG with stronger academic and management credentials. Hank Barnette’s term ends and he’s not eligible for reappointment. Steve Farmer and Robert Wells’ terms also end on June 30 and they are eligible for reappointment. If change is going to occur, they cannot be reappointed. There needs to be three new appointments to the BOG effective July 1 and those appointed need to be something other than good old boys (or girls) and former roommates.

  140. Steph Says:

    Jayne Armstrong pointed out D-Day in her letter, also. Yesterday, I think.

    observer @3/39 RE: retaliation

    That is a very real fear, and it can materialize regardless of the MG demise.

    Booya - that is a good memory you have about the Goodwin quote - nasty!

    The idea of a running report from the BOG - “make it so” somebody! It would be much appreciated.

  141. Steph Says:

    Lou:

    I recall a warning to specify nominations to the “WVU” BOG as other boards business goes on as well.

  142. fox hunter Says:

    at the last BOG meeting, you could get regular updates from:
    http://twitter.com/lbaustinwsaz

  143. PG Reader