Tomorrow Is The Most Important Day in the History of WVU
Mike Garrison hangs on by a thread. The whole world mocks him—a bloated, rasping bully, painfully out of his depth. In the spotlight’s glare, he’s so godawful embarrassing that I almost feel sorry for him. He desperately wants to sound like a university president, but he just doesn’t have the brains for it. It turns out he’s not even much of a politician, at least when dealing with people who he can’t pay off or strong-arm. He gives one wrong, dumb, unbelievable answer after another. If you’ve seen or read his interviews, you know what I mean—the attention from this scandal has permanently unmasked him as a mediocre fraud, wildly inadequate to the job he stole and the mess he’s made of it.
And now, out of nowhere, his patron Goodwin has quit. The Gazette has gotten religion in the eleventh hour. WVU is losing millions of dollars in donations. He faces a third no-confidence vote in less than a year. Boss Garrison is in dire straits.
But he still figures time is on his side. School’s almost out. More important, the scandal is running out of newsworthy events. On Wednesday, the University Assembly will vote no-confidence and demand his resignation. He’ll respond with a statement that some high-dollar Washington PR firm is no doubt writing, on WVU’s dime, as I type these words. (It’s probably Joe Carey’s firm, which leads me to digress: if anyone with access to a grand jury happens to be reading this, ask around about Joe Carey using the state plane as a taxpayer taxi to visit his fancy girlfriend in NYC, after a postcoital Wise flew the coop to Sandy’s doghouse and left the kids in the Governor’s office totally unsupervised. In fact, ask if Bob Wise knew about it. That worthless shitbag would literally piss his Fruit-of-the-Looms if he got a federal target letter — and he certainly deserves to wet himself after ending his richly deserved exile just to defend Garrison.) Garrison will promise more pay raises and daycare centers and “healing.” And then things will quiet down. He will have been pushed to the very brink, but he will live to fight another day.
That’s Garrison’s endgame.
The faculty — AND ONLY THE FACULTY — can stop him from getting away with it. Let’s not delude ourselves about a criminal investigation or a legislative review. The political cesspool that created this problem isn’t going to solve it. The faculty are the only organized force with the independence and the courage to stand up to Garrison (and more important, to Manchin, who’s the real reason the political class is afraid to take this on).
That’s why tomorrow, when the University Assembly votes on Garrison, is the most important day in WVU’s history. Because if Garrison survives this — after giving away a master’s degree as a naked political favor, like a job holding a STOP/SLOW sign in Logan County — then whatever is left of WVU as an “academic” institution will be gone. The precedent will be set: The governor, the president, and the board can use WVU as their personal slush fund and political machine, right out in the open, with no fear of repercussions. And make no mistake: as soon as the spotlight’s off, Garrison will gut those who opposed him. NO JOB AT WVU WILL BE SAFE. Multimillionaire Julian Bailes and goons like him will be free to roam campus handing out pink slips and demanding fealty to Garrison — or else. Even worse, a whole generation of budding politicos will begin bidding to be the next politician-president of WVU, knowing that the one who can harness the university’s budget and prestige to his own political ends will come out on top. It’s no exaggeration to say that if Mike Garrison can pull this off, WVU will never be the same again.
We’re at a crossroads, friends.
At a minimum, the Assembly has to vote overwhelmingly in favor of Garrison’s resignation. That’ll put the story back in the national news for another cycle. But if all the faculty do is vote no-confidence and then fall silent, it won’t be enough to force Garrison out.
Instead, to win this fight — and to save my alma mater — the faculty have to use unconventional measures to keep the story in the news. Here’s one simple guerilla tactic: pass a resolution that not only votes no-confidence and demands Garrison’s resignation, but also requires the Faculty Senate to vote on a no-confidence/resignation resolution every single month as long as Garrison is president. That’d create an automatic mechanism to continue registering the faculty’s disgust — and continue generating news stories about the faculty’s struggle against the polluted Garrison administration. (None of the current resolutions includes that option, but the Assembly uses Robert’s Rules of Order, so the resolutions can be amended from the floor.) Professor Larry Hornak proposed another excellent idea at yesterday’s Senate meeting: put teeth in the Senate’s no-confidence vote by boycotting Garrison’s sham search committee for a new provost. And if Garrison ultimately refuses to leave, the faculty shouldn’t hesitate to use the nuclear option: stop teaching until he packs up his cash-filled briefcase and leaves Stewart Hall. I’m dead serious. The university itself hangs in the balance.
In short, the faculty have to declare war. A mere one-and-done vote will lose the school. It’s a lot to ask, I know. But we’re also in a rare window of opportunity. Right now, for a fleeting moment, the faculty have the power. Garrison is on his heels. The faculty hold the moral and political high ground. If they seize the moment and aggressively press their advantage, they can bury him. They can take back WVU. And if they don’t, they’ll regret it forever. We all will.
Tags: Heathergate, Mike Garrison
May 13, 2008 at 5:44 am
You are right HK. This whole episode has exposed Garrison for what he is and the people of the good State of West Virginia deserve better from their leaders. For the good of WVU I remain hopeful that this is an inflection point for the better.
May 13, 2008 at 5:59 am
Excellent post HK, excellent. Unfortunately, also true. Keep up the good work. Agree 100% with you, the faculty has to get this man out. He is a disgrace to mankind. To my alma mater. To the state of WV. To his little girls. I have often wondered what he tells them when he puts them to bed at night.
About to leave for the airport for some bliss in Europe. Will be watching this mess from there. But, TOMORROW my thoughts will be with the faculty. Do the right thing. Show this thug he does not have what it takes to ruin my alma mater. God bless.
May 13, 2008 at 6:00 am
As you said, HK: “As soon as the spotlight’s off, Garrison will gut those who opposed him. NO JOB AT WVU WILL BE SAFE.”
May 13, 2008 at 6:41 am
No job is safe now! The tension is palpable. Stewart Hall is like a morgue. Other administrative areas are void of any discussion on the subject. Most non-faculty employees are in real fear that what they say may cost them their jobs. Veiled threats are made by the administrators who also are in fear of looing their jobs. It is unfortunate that the others at WVU aren’t speaking out. However, it is also understandable that they can not afford to do so, even knowing that all that has occured is a sham. They feel no whistleblower protection at all. Garrisone must go. I just wish there was a way to make that happen without becoming unemployed.
May 13, 2008 at 7:05 am
Another prominent West Virginian and WVU alum–although he’s a nationally recognized heavyweight author and intellectual who loves his home state, WVU and the Mountaineers, so what the hell does he know?–has weighed in internationally on the scandal (in the UK Guardian…oh, and he likes Hippie Killer):
Country Roads
US elections 2008: My home state of West Virginia used to reliably vote Democratic. But then things changed
Michael Tomasky
Articles
* Latest
* Show all
Profile
Webfeed
All Michael Tomasky articles
About Webfeeds
May 12, 2008 7:00 PM | Printable version
So, West Virginia. Have I mentioned that I know the place a little? I was born in Morgantown, a small city of about 90,000 or so people that’s about five miles below the Mason-Dixon Line. I lived the first 24 years of my life there, even attending West Virginia University, which is located in my hometown. Back in the 1970s Morgantown was the kind of place where it didn’t really occur to most kids, even relatively smart ones, that there was any need to go to school anywhere except WVU.
So I know the place pretty well, except, I confess, that Morgantown is different than most of the state - because the university is there, with a large medical school and other departments that bring in people from around the country and to some extent the world, it’s more, dare I say, cosmopolitan and liberal. What you probably think of as West Virginia - the “hollers” down south where the towns have one stoplight and homeowners cock their shotguns when a strange car pulls up - is a place I’ve visited from time to time, but when I was young the roads were awful, so there are still large sections of the state I haven’t really seen.
But I know this much: it used to be knee-jerk Democratic and isn’t any more. Before civil rights and abortion and all those blasted social issues, back when the Democratic party meant unions and working men, hardly a Republican could get elected dogcatcher anywhere (except sometimes the eastern panhandle, where there was no coal to speak of, and hence no unions). Nobody cared that Franklin Roosevelt was an elitist, and everybody was a Democrat, except the small-business people and a few cranks. The state had had segregated schools, but in 1954, in the wake of the Brown decision by the US Supreme Court, they integrated for the most part rather peacefully. In the 1960s and early 1970s, West Virginia - West Virginia! - had one of the most progressive and most respected state supreme courts in America.
In the late 1970s, things started happening. There was a huge controversy over school textbooks in the capital, Charleston, something about evolution as I recall. Slowly, pro-lifers roused themselves to fight Roe v Wade. The Southern Baptist Convention - the conservative umbrella group under which nearly all the right-wing pastors serve - started moving into the state. I once looked this up. When I was a kid there were maybe half a dozen Southern Baptist churches in the whole state. When I looked it up, around 2000, there were more than 300.
And, over the same period, union jobs dried up. It wasn’t that the coal was mined out. Oh, no: there’s a couple centuries’ worth of coal in those hills yet. The technology changed. Jobs that once required 50 men now need just five or 10. They’re mining as much tonnage now as they did during the war, or more, even, with something like one-tenth of the work force.
So what are you gonna do? If people get … OK, let’s not say bitter, but frustrated, then by God they have a right to it. And things are unlikely to get better, because, while coal will have to be part of our electricity supply in this country for a long time to come, it is also the case that we need to become less dependent on coal and move toward renewable sources of energy and (in my opinion) more nuclear power. People are developing “clean-coal” technologies, but it remains to be seen whether these will prove politically and financially feasible.
To complete the portrait, I’m afraid that I can’t not mention the tawdry and humiliating scandal that has consumed the old school, in which Heather Bresch, the daughter of governor Joe Manchin and high-level employee of a pharmaceutical-company owner who is one of the university’s largest benefactors, was wrongly awarded a master’s degree from the business school even though she’d completed only 26 of the 48 required credit-hours. (The in-state blogger hippiekiller, who in spite of his handle seems pretty boldly liberal-populist to me, is all over this.) The scandal has confirmed for outsiders virtually every negative perception of the state that exists.
And so, it’s changed pretty dramatically in my lifetime. As it happens, I was born the last year West Virginia mattered in the presidential primary season. It was 1960, and John Kennedy was running against Hubert Humphrey. West Virginia was advertised in advance as the proving ground for the Catholic Kennedy - could he get votes in a Protestant state? He did, and the mavens of the press decided it meant that JFK could indeed be elected president as a Catholic. That his father bought off half the sheriffs in the state may be true, but nevertheless West Virginia, because of that vote, stood as a symbol of forbearance for many years.
Today … my dear old friend in Pocahontas County, Ed Tallman, is out volunteering for Barack Obama and blogs on Obama’s site. With prescience, he wrote on April 10 that it would be rather ironic if “the state that delivered John F Kennedy to the Democratic party by demonstrating religious tolerance should deliver Hillary the nomination by demonstrating something akin to the opposite of tolerance.”
The question of the nomination would seem to be off the table now, but even so Clinton will win the state by 30 percentage points. Of the state’s 55 counties, mine, Monongalia, is one of three or four in my estimation that Obama might carry. And, almost certainly, the state will go for John McCain in November, and I think would even against Clinton. Obama’s only plus is that, since his state is also a coal-producer, he’s pretty pro-coal, to the consternation of greens everywhere, so he can’t really be tagged as a tree-hugger like Al Gore was.
But hey, it’s home. I still love it like I love no place else. And we have ass-kicking football and basketball teams - only a handful of universities in the country can make that claim about both sports, and you better believe it matters, along with a great women’s soccer team. We play Auburn at home on October 23, during the heat of the fall campaign. I’ll be in Morgantown for that one, and I’ll report back then on the political situation.
May 13, 2008 at 7:07 am
Here’s the link to Tomasky’s article. What’s cool is it includes a hyper-link to this site. Bravo, Tomasky.
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michael_tomasky/2008/05/country_roads.html
May 13, 2008 at 7:38 am
Well said HK! For those who are eligible to vote at the Assembly & fear reprisals–remember it is a SECRET BALLOT. Bring it on!!
May 13, 2008 at 7:38 am
I can not wait to cast my vote in favor of his resignation!! Lets GOOOOOO Mountaineers!
May 13, 2008 at 7:49 am
Outstanding post HK!! Truly!! In modern WV history, this is a witershed moment. This “waging the war of ideals” is about principles and values….things totally lost on the recent political leadership of this state, it’s major institutions, and the leadership of the larger community.
This entry puts you, IMHO, in the lineage of ole Tommy Paine; and he would be proud…
http://postgazette.com/pg/08134/881314-298.stm
May 13, 2008 at 8:00 am
To the barricades! Right on!
A spirited call to arms.
You have been dead on for over a year HK.
Keep it up!
May 13, 2008 at 8:02 am
Great post HK. I’ve sent emails to all of my old profs at WVU, telling them of my concerns for the integrity of the university and asking them to vote no confidence tomorrow.
As for Garrison, I can’t decide if he’s a dumbshit or a stupidfuck, but I hope he’s soon doing the one job for which he’s qualified - decorating the front of a Shoney’s as their new ‘Big Boy.’
May 13, 2008 at 8:09 am
I hope everyone who reads today’s Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article is as disgusted as I am that TWO of the FIVE crucial proposals WVU faculty will consider tomorrow deal with intimidation. And they are necessary.
Bullying, intimidation and promoting political appointees at WVU hardly began with Garrison — it’s the culture. WVU employees are afraid of losing their jobs if they speak out. They’re right to be afraid. As Worker Bee said, “There’s no whistleblower protection. No job is safe now.”
According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, biochemistry professor William Wonderlin’s proposal establishes an outside panel as a “safe zone” where faculty, staff and students can report incidents of intimidation. That’s a start.
The PPG quotes another faculty member in favor of Garrison’s resignation who cited “a profound fear of reprisal” at WVU’s Health Sciences Center. That is sickening. Nobody deserves to work in fear. WVU’s current motto should be: Watch your back.
HK is right. Tomorrow is the most important day in WVU’s history. In the 20 years I’ve been associated with WVU, this is the most employees I’ve seen stand up together. And it’s always a risk.
To faculty with a vote: Save WVU’s reputation. Change this corrupt culture.
May 13, 2008 at 8:14 am
Well said Ann, well said. How things have changed, unfortunately for the worse, at my beloved WVU. And, when I said, in the event of Hillary becoming the Democratic candidate, I would vote for McCain, my buds thought I was crazy. Check out the wire news … who’s flanking her? The Manchins! Wonder why? Birds of a feather? Come on Barack, let’s get you into the WH (hopefully Mikey will be out of the Presidential mansion and in the only house where he belongs: the BIG house!)
May 13, 2008 at 8:23 am
[...] (continued at Fifth Column) [...]
May 13, 2008 at 8:38 am
Uh, fatmackerel–Mo’town’s population is maybe pushing toward 90K on big game days, but I think it’s worth reminding folks that it’s a lot smaller than than usually–about 25K townfolk and another 25K of students. The place is REALLY small.
To everyone–print this latest post and fax it to your favorite WVU department. Do it from a Kinko’s and no one will know it was you.
Great post, HK. Good luck, WVU.
May 13, 2008 at 8:47 am
WV Alum–Lets leave Hilary out of it for now, keep the pressure on Garrison & Manchin!
May 13, 2008 at 9:03 am
Agreed, fox hunter, let’s not get sidetracked by national political events.
As I’ve tried to say on another thread, this isn’t a D vs. R issue in the least. All of us West Virginians should be of one accord on the necessity of getting rid of Garrison, his patrons and cronies. The destruction of WVU’s reputation by the incompetent and disingenuous Garrison is bad for everyone, whether Democrat, Republican, business owner or employee (union or nonunion).
May 13, 2008 at 9:13 am
Jayne Armstrong, the former student govt pres who wrote an op-ed in today’s Gazette, said it well:
“I ask everyone to take a step back and look at this WVU MBA situation from a different perspective. This scandal is not isolated to WVU and West Virginia. It is national in scope. Our integrity has been questioned as WVU alumni. People in the business community are asking us whether we earned our degrees or received them through our connections. This is no laughing matter, yet WVU has become the laughing stock of the higher education community.
It is especially troubling when it impacts our student recruiting …”
http://www.wvgazette.com/Opinion/Op-EdCommentaries/200805120585
This is what I meant by the Garrison mess affecting all of us, regardless of political affiliation, and why it’s important to stay focused and united.
May 13, 2008 at 9:33 am
Politics got us in this mess. Academic integrity and ethics (like many things) must be bipartisan issues. But be careful - reprisals occur at all levels - ask any classified staff, contingent faculty, GA, and other students. It’s like domestic abuse; acting out what has been done to you. Retaliation does not all originate at Stewart Hall, and stones will be cast all around. Be prepared to clean house in many ways, for years to come.
The spotlight shines on you all now. The next domino is Garrison, and tackling WV laws may be more than you can sustain when the noise dies down. Some have already given up - Thank you WVU Senate for the wisdom to express “no confidence” as many times as you must and will again. Thank you PPG for opening wide this door.
Both entities are simply doing their jobs and following the rules. What a novel idea. Sign the petitions, and stick with it. And don’t perpetuate the retaliation - Do no harm and think of your legacy.
May 13, 2008 at 9:34 am
from the post-gaz today…
Mr. Garrison will not be speaking at any of the commencement ceremonies but will be present at a few of the events, university spokeswoman Amy Neil said yesterday in an e-mail. “It’s important for everybody to note … graduation is not about me,” Ms. Neil quoted Mr. Garrison as saying.
Now I could have sworn I saw Mikey as the keynote speaker for Eberly…can anyone confirm this?
Faculty - everyone is 100% behind you!!! YOU ARE OUR ONLY HOPE!!!
May 13, 2008 at 9:39 am
To WVU MA CREW: Yes,he WAS to be the speaker…but this was a word of mouth, I don’t have documentation to post to show this, sorry. Anybody else? It DOES represent a victory, albeit a small one….
May 13, 2008 at 9:40 am
There are many faculty who would like to attend tomorrow but who have specific work-related obligations that cannot be easily changed. There is no provision for proxy or absentee voting, which means that many of us who would like to be at the meeting have to choose between our commitment to our previously-planned work obligations and our desire to show up and be counted.
May 13, 2008 at 9:40 am
Thank you LaReina, for commenting on this issue superseding politics. I know this blog will always have the liberal leaning, and I can accept that. Issues as big as this one must transcend what side of the aisle one might be on.
May 13, 2008 at 9:59 am
Please, please keep up the pressure. Having personal experience of being labeled a “whistleblower” by this administration and then forced by intimidation to resign and move on, I know this is a “culture” that still persists.
Best of luck-we are thinking of you.
May 13, 2008 at 10:04 am
A-HA! I knew I read it - it was on a WVU press release a while back, so when I looked again it had been changed to reflect the current speaker. (look under “commencement activities”). I then googled Eberly Garrison Commencement and hit cashed and here is what I found (I know NOTHING about computers, so pardon my back-asswards way of doing this)
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:AffeXkhRtpIJ:wvutoday.wvu.edu/news/page/6752/+Eberly+Commencement+Garrison&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
HE WAS THE SPEAKER for Eberly commencement and BACKED OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
May 13, 2008 at 10:06 am
Work obligations will still be there on Thursday.
This is a once in 30 years opportunity.
May 13, 2008 at 10:11 am
Oh, and if any students are reading this, someone on here gave what I consider the best “protest” proposal out there.
IF Garrison is the guy handing out degrees when you walk across the stage, simply say to him you refuse to accept your degree (or shake his hand) from him and simply request one of the other robed figures standing up there hand you the parchment.
You don’t have to yell it, or anything. Everyone watching will know what happened. It will be quiet, respectful, unobtrusive, yet will delay the situation for a few seconds, and put the spotlight’s glare right back on Garrison.
May 13, 2008 at 10:11 am
We need more people like Larry Hornak, a computer engineering professor, who has refused to help Garrison search for a new provost, and Virginia Kleist, who resigned from the committee Garrison put together to implement changes “so this doesn’t happen to other students”. The administrators and deans who are not speaking up, are supporting Garrison as far as I am concerned.
Whats up with Steve Kite - he is supposed to be representing the faculty. He should resign from the faculty senate and BOG too.
May 13, 2008 at 10:23 am
A WVTV article says that 500 Morgantown business and community leaders have signed a letter supporting Garrison.
Someone posted a good question: “Does anyone out there have any information on who exactly are the 500 community and business leaders? I would love to have that list.” Ditto.
May 13, 2008 at 10:30 am
News and comment as appearing in the Dominion Post of May 13:
“Person who posted disturbing fliers ID’d by police:”
Yesterday’s paper reported that someone posted fliers in the Engineering Building, described today as being “[I]n varying type sizes, with no punctuation except one set of ellipses, one says, ‘Kill the root/Kill the candidacy of Joe Manchin/Garrison and the BOG are just symptoms/. . . that must resign,” and one says, “in part, ‘You really shouldn’t/Kill a WVU BOG member today/That would be evil and criminal.” Yesterday’s paper reported that faculty turned in the fliers to the police, and the person who posted them was ID’d today. Yesterday, a State Police spokesman said the fliers were not “a direct threat to the governor’s security,” but rather, “a direct threat to his candidacy and with freedom of speech, you’re allowed to threaten his candidacy.”
Dallas Branch, a faculty senate member, said he would introduce a “resolution that the faculty not permit this kind of conduct among members.” This seems like more spin to depict the faculty as “radicals” and troublemakers. The article said the person, ID’d by WVU police, has not been charged and is a “university employee.” According to the WVU police spokesman, on the basis of consultation with the prosecutor’s office the person has not been charged.
Letters: two pro MG (incl. Joe Hardy’s letter posted here), one pro-resignation. Marcello Napolitano claims a no-confidence vote is “mass academic suicide” and that Garrison has been effective in working with legislature. I can’t see, however, how at least SOME of the legislators in the future might not be leery of giving more funding to WVU after this scandal, not to mention the alumni who have already indicated that they will stop supporting WVU until MG resigns.
May 13, 2008 at 10:40 am
Whoops, that’s WDTV.com.
May 13, 2008 at 10:46 am
if 500 people have signed a letter in support of garrison, we need more to sign the petition against him
PLEASE SIGN THE MIR PETITION AND PASS IT TO PEOPLE YOU KNOW WILL SIGN - very important!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.wvumir.org/petition.html
May 13, 2008 at 10:54 am
I would be amazed if there were 500 community and business leaders in Morgantown. If there’s a petition floating around with that many signatures, the definition of “community and business leaders” must be so broad that it includes high school students in Junior Achievement.
May 13, 2008 at 11:05 am
I’m a lifelong resident of West Virginia, possess a law degree from West Virginia University and have practiced for 20+ in WV. on numerous occasions, I have personally experienced the combination of judicial incompetence and/or corruption that have rightly earned the State the title of judicial hellhole. Before this WVU debacle arose, I had decided to cut my losses and move on. My children took my advice and attended college outside the state of West Virginia and are now employed outside the state.
Just in terms of raw statistics, if I relocate anywhere aside from Mississippi, my economic prospects will improve.
This is not East Germany during the Cold War. They can not force us to stay here. If Mike Garrison wants to be governor and preside over the inevitable economic Armageddon that the state faces, more power to him.
I for one will no longer be in line to foot the bill.
May 13, 2008 at 11:12 am
Keep the pressure on. I am not a big donor, a faculty member, or a well-known name. I’m a student, soon to be an alumni. Regardless of the outcome, I will not donate to WVU or vote for Manchin until Garrison is gone and WVU has a qualified, credible, independent president and a Board of Governors that demonstrates a concern for academic integrity and advancing the reputation of the university.
May 13, 2008 at 11:15 am
A bit of humor along with the darkness. Go to “wvu.edu” and choose “A-Z Index”. From there, a short scroll brings you to the topic “Academic Integrity.” Click that, and … Error 404: File Not Found.
May 13, 2008 at 11:30 am
I guess its expected that a massive sychophant like Napolitano STILL supports Garrison (letter in DP). If you know Napolitano, you know he is very much like Garrison in that he only thinks of himself, ALWAYS. He has a clear vested interest, through some of the upper channels in WVU, in seeing Garrison stay. This is THE common trait of many of the WVU supporters of Garrison. These idiots are willing to sell out WVU’s academic integrity for their own personal gain. They are no better than Garrison and his cronies. It is as sad and simple as that. When Garrison goes, they will have to face their colleagues and hang their heads in shame.
May 13, 2008 at 11:40 am
Post gazette is running the with Eberly commencement speaker “switch-er-roo”.
The press release was changed on the website from its original release date of April 25. Gee, wonder what made Garrison change his mind about speaking to the graduates who fucking EARNED their diploma’s ?
Anybody in Eberly with info re: decision of switched speaker, contact Len at lboselovic@post-gazette.com
May 13, 2008 at 11:49 am
Votingwithmyfeet,
I have been to Mississippi several times lately, working on a progressive health project, and I think you might fare better there, too
May 13, 2008 at 11:53 am
Early word is the faculty will not be able to get the necessary 700 faculty members to have a quorum. That’s a shame they can’t take the vote.
Get to the polls and vote Obama!!!!!!
May 13, 2008 at 11:57 am
Remember, we must all hang together, or surely, we will hang separately.
This is no time for “previous commitments” - finals are over for crying out loud. Your ability to hold your head high (sans paper bag) is at stake.
May 13, 2008 at 11:59 am
I am very surprised and disappointed that WVU faculty seem so blind to the power relations that existed in Stewart Hall when this catastrophic decision was made. Even Provost Lang has made it clear that he approved of this decision WITHOUT pressure from above. The interviews of the various folks involved support this critical reality.
There is much political-economic analysis in these blogs but I have yet to find a satisfactory analysis of one of the fundamental questions of this fiasco: why did Provost Lang allow this to happen? He has so much experience and does not make quick decisions about important matters. So why in this case? I know most readers (if not all) of this blog will just assume it was presidential pressure and collusion. So please help me understand why Lang would support a hasty and remarkably shallow decision to support the folks who had recently rejected him when he wanted to be the WVU President?
I urge you all to look beyond the ‘obvious’ and struggle to understand what happened when this decision was made in October. Who was calling the shots? Why? What was the motivation?
My opinion is that Mike Garrison is MUCH more supportive of faculty when compared to the Hardesty-Lang administration. He actually respects what we do. I also feel that refusing to work with him is misguided, at best. You might want to be very careful about what you ask for. The next WVU President could be much less open to faculty concerns.
And one more point - we are the adults, the mentors, the teachers. Let’s have this debate with openness and respect.
May 13, 2008 at 12:01 pm
If you have to have 700 for a quorum, it’s no wonder it hasn’t been called in 30 years.
May 13, 2008 at 12:05 pm
Exactly concerned@11:59 !!!
Settle for what you have now!! Who knows what more corrupt value system another adminstration could have!!
Shhesshhh man….get a backbone….
May 13, 2008 at 12:05 pm
“Openness and respect?”
Like the openness of that October meeting? And the openness of the withholding of phone records? And the respect that Steve Goodwin and Garrison has shown the facutly senate, let alone, the faculty themselves? And the openness of Mrs. “My word is better than a transcript” Bresch?
I’ve had about all the openness and respect I can tolerate out of this crew for a long, long, time.
May 13, 2008 at 12:09 pm
And another thing.
Wouldn’t it be fantastic, IF the faculty did their assembly tomorrow (and got the quorum, which, I hope they do, but it’s not looking likely), AND showed up to the assembly IN their commencement regalia?
Wouldn’t that be a fucking sight? The visual presentation on TV and in pcitures would be out of this world.
May 13, 2008 at 12:55 pm
Don’t be so pessimistic about the quorum! Geez, nothing like trying to dampen enthusiasm before anything has a chance to happen!
May 13, 2008 at 1:00 pm
I don’t see mention of a quorum in the faculty constitution - regarding the assembly.
May 13, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Another tidbit from a DP article, headlined “Some WVU faculty fear retribution.” Prof. Boyd Edwards told DP that a faculty senator told him that he was not “comfortable sharing [his] views about this [vote of no confidence] on the phone.” A student said friends active in student affairs were telling him opposition to Garrison was wrong, even though Garrison personally never pressured him. The DP agreed not to identify the student.
May 13, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Lurking is right, there is a requirement of 10 for the Faculty Senate, but nothing for the Assembly. The constitution even states that to amend the Faculty Constitution it takes two thirds of Assembly members responding, but no minimum necessary.
May 13, 2008 at 1:29 pm
[...] comment from the blog Fifth Column “A bit of humor along with the darkness. Go to “wvu.edu” and [...]
May 13, 2008 at 1:40 pm
The Phys Ed Professor that introduced the motion…
was on Talkline with Hoppy this morning. He said the Faculty Senate required 40% attendance before they could conduct business. He admitted that there is nothing in the constitution that defines a quorum for the Faculty Assembly, but he did state that in general a quorum is 50%+1.
Im not sure how accurate that is, but it is what he said.
May 13, 2008 at 1:43 pm
The quorum rumor sounds like a red herring designed to dampen faculty turnout—like the rumors the GOP spreads in low-income areas that you can’t vote if you own back taxes, or whatever.
May 13, 2008 at 1:43 pm
Sorry, “owe back taxes.”
May 13, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Pasted below is the email msg from Kite that disenfranchises the Parkersburg campus….No possibility of broadcasting??? Gee, I thought that the eMBA program had “distance learning” connection set up with the Parkersburg campus back in 1998. Couldn’t we borrow their set-up or did the equipment get lost along with the paperwork for Heather’s degree? What about webcams? Call Kite & tell him to try a little harder to allow the the Parkersburg faculty to participate.
Dear faculty colleagues,
It is with deep regret that I must advise our faculty members at distant sites that there is no possibility of broadcasting the University Assembly outside of the Creative Arts Center in Morgantown. While all faculty are welcome to travel to the WVU Evansdale Campus to attend the University Assembly, we can provide no alternatives that do not involve a physical appearance in order to participate. Unfortunately, proxy voting is not allowed. The CAC site is the only venue with good acoustics that is large enough to hold a significant percentage of the WVU faculty.
It is unfortunate that approximately 10% of our faculty work in sites removed from the University Assemble meeting site. I will encourage the Senate to address this issue in the future as the guidelines for a University Assembly are clarified and broadcast technology is upgraded.
Sincerely,
J. Steven Kite, Faculty Senate Chair
Department of Geology & Geography
G43 Brooks Hall
West Virginia University
Morgantown, WV, USA 26506-6300
304-293-9819
May 13, 2008 at 2:21 pm
GARRISON MUST GO: Are you intentionally trying to mislead people on this blog? Get your facts straight…the motion from the phys ed faculty is the one seconded by Famouri about intimidation. To set things straight, all six motions to be considered at the Assembly are pasted below. To make it easier to read, I pasted a brief version of each motion at the top, followed by full info on who submitted & seconded each motion at the bottom.
MOTIONS
1. MOTION: The Faculty Senate of West Virginia University votes no
confidence in President Mike Garrison. For the good of the institution
and for the benefit of our students, he must resign or the Board of
Governors must require his resignation.
Motion 2. Be it resolved that the West Virginia University Faculty Senate
recommends that any faculty member found responsible for intimidating,
coercive, and/or threatening language, behavior, correspondence, or
postings will be subject to immediate disciplinary action including
dismissal. This includes, but is not limited to, specific “death threats
made against another University employee, governing board member, or
State of West Virginia executive”.Submitted for consideration on Sunday, May 12 at 10:40 a.m.
MOTION 3: We, the faculty, call for a re-evaluation of the composition
of the WVU Board of Governors, with a view to increasing its
transparency, representativeness and accountability.
Motion 4: West Virginia University shall establish an external review
panel to whom faculty, staff and students can confidentially report
their concerns regarding harassment, retribution, or employment status
that are related to opinions they have expressed about the current
university administration. Within 90 days of its creation, this panel
shall provide a statement indicating the extent of the reported
concerns, as well as a recommendation whether the panel should continue
in its monitoring activities.
Motion #5 ….There shall be an open search conducted by a search committee, the majority of whose members will be faculty of the relevant division of
the university. (In the case of department chairs the search may be
conducted by the department acting as a search committee).
After interviewing a short list of candidates, the search committee
shall recommend suitable candidates to the immediate superior to whom
the selected person reports and to the faculty of the relevant division
for approval. (In the case of officers of the entire university, the
Faculty Senate shall represent the faculty; in the case of the President
of the University, the immediate superior is the Board of Governors) If
the immediate superior and the relevant faculty cannot agree on one or
more acceptable candidates, the search will be reopened until acceptable
candidates are approved.
The immediate superior shall then fill the position from among the
approved candidates.
MOTION 6: The Faculty Assembly requests that the West Virginia State
Legislature change the number and method of appointments to the WVU
Board of Governors (BOG). We request specifically that the number of
governor’s appointees should be reduced in favor of positions to be
allocated to elected representatives of the alumni. The proportion of
faculty, student and staff representatives should be maintained.
FULL TEXT ALL SIX MOTIONS FOLLOWS
Motion #1 from Sherman D. Riemenschneider (ECAS) and Katy Ryan (ECAS)
for consideration at the Faculty Assembly on May 14, 2008:
Sherm.Riemenschneider@mail.wvu.edu 3-2011 x2322
kohearnr@mail.wvu.edu 3-9729
The Faculty Assembly of West Virginia University concurs with the
Riemenschneider/Ryan motion that was passed by the Faculty Senate on May
5, 2008.
_______________________________
Text of the motion from Sherman D. Riemenschneider (senator from ECAS)
and Katy Ryan (senator from ECAS) passed by the WVU Faculty Senate on
May 5, 2008:
Sherm.Riemenschneider@mail.wvu.edu 3-2011 x2322
kohearnr@mail.wvu.edu 3-9729
The award of an unearned eMBA degree to Heather Bresch has called the
academic integrity of West Virginia University into serious question and
has led to unprecedented public outrage and embarrassment to WVU.
President Mike Garrison assigned his senior advisors to participate in
the deliberations that led to this award. The extent of his subsequent
personal involvement in or knowledge of this award is the subject of
widespread speculation fueled by his perceived lack of candor and the
unusual manner in which these deliberations were carried out.
This speculation has shaken confidence in his leadership. Calls for
his resignation are emanating from faculty, students, and alumni in all
parts of the country. WVU donors have rescinded major contributions
pending his removal from office. Critical and derisive press coverage
has appeared around the globe. We have never seen the WVU community so
divided, so afraid, and so deeply troubled.
As President of WVU, Mike Garrison bears a unique responsibility to act
in the best interests of the University. Regardless of the extent of
his direct involvement, the highly publicized award of an unearned eMBA
under his watch has damaged his effectiveness and his credibility as
President. We doubt that WVU will be able to restore its reputation and
its academic integrity under his leadership.
MOTION: The Faculty Senate of West Virginia University votes no
confidence in President Mike Garrison. For the good of the institution
and for the benefit of our students, he must resign or the Board of
Governors must require his resignation.
Motion #2 from Dallas Branch, School of Physical Education
dbranch@wvu.edu 293-3295 x 5264
Second to the Motion:
Parviz Famouri, College of Engineering & Mineral Resources
pfamouri@wvu.edu 293-0405 x 2530
Article II of the WVU Faculty Constitution states, “The Senate shall
have authority, as the recognized body representing faculty, to
recommend general policies to the President and the governing and policy
boards with regard to :
5.e. Responsibilities, rights, and duties of faculty members, such as
standards of appointments and conduct…on all matters of faculty
welfare…;
Motion:
Be it resolved that the West Virginia University Faculty Senate
recommends that any faculty member found responsible for intimidating,
coercive, and/or threatening language, behavior, correspondence, or
postings will be subject to immediate disciplinary action including
dismissal. This includes, but is not limited to, specific “death threats
made against another University employee, governing board member, or
State of West Virginia executive”.
Submitted for consideration on Sunday, May 12 at 10:40 a.m.
Motion #3 Sponsors:
Prof. Adam Komisaruk, Department of English, akomisar@wvu.edu
Prof. Linda Shuster, Dept. of Speech Pathology & Audiology,
lshuster@wvu.edu
Since July 1, 2001, the West Virginia University Board of Governors has
been the sole governing body for WVU and its affiliated campuses. The
Board comprises the following members (WVU BOG Operating Procedures,
Articles 1.2-1.3, http://bog.wvu.edu/procedures):
. “one full-time member of the faculty with the rank of instructor or
above duly elected by the faculty [2-year term, renewable for “three
additional terms, not to exceed a total of eight consecutive years”];
. “one member of the student body in good academic standing, enrolled
for college credit work and duly elected by the student body [1-year
term];
. “one member of the institutional classified employees duly elected
by the classified employees [2-year term, renewable for “three
additional terms, not to exceed a total of eight consecutive years”];
. “the chairpersons of the institutional Boards of Advisors of the
Community and Technical College at West Virginia University Institute of
Technology and of West Virginia University at Parkersburg [2-year
terms];
. “the chairperson of the Board of Visitors at West Virginia
University Institute of Technology [2-year term];
. “and twelve lay members appointed by the governor with the advice
and consent of the Senate [4-year staggered terms, renewable for one
additional term].”
The BOG thus accords a minority voice to the constituencies directly
bound by its actions. Duly elected agents of the faculty, staff and
students of WVU are outnumbered by political appointees 12 to 6. Such
an arrangement compromises the responsiveness of the BOG to the
interests of the WVU community. The controversy involving the award of
an eMBA degree to Heather Bresch has badly shaken the confidence of that
community in the integrity of its own governance. To restore this
confidence, the time has come to explore systemic reforms to the BOG.
Strategies might include, but are not limited to, increasing the ratio
of elected to unelected members; increasing the ratio of faculty, staff
and/or student members to lay members; creating seats for labor and/or
academic representatives external to WVU. The gravity of this task
demands the involvement of all parties with a stake in WVU, culminating
if appropriate in legislative action.
MOTION: We, the faculty, call for a re-evaluation of the composition
of the WVU Board of Governors, with a view to increasing its
transparency, representativeness and accountability.
Motion #4 from:
Bill Wonderlin
Associate Professor
Department of Biochemistry
WVU Health Sciences Center
wwonderlin@hsc.wvu.edu, 293-3159
Seconded by:
Judith A. Sedgeman, EdD
Education Director
West Virginia Initiative for Innate Health
at the Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center
jsedgeman@hsc.wvu.edu
Michael R. Miller
Professor
Department of Biochemistry
WVU Health Sciences Center
mmiller@hsc.wvu.edu
————————————
The foundation of a university’s activities is the guarantee that all
faculty and students can engage in free speech without fear of
harassment or retribution for the positions that they may advocate. This
freedom of expression should encompass not only the traditional academic
environment of the classroom, but also the broader activities of our
university community, including the opinions faculty and students might
wish to express about the activities of the university administration.
However, there is growing concern on the campus of West Virginia
University that criticism of President Garrison and his administration
may lead to harassment, retribution, or even loss of employment. These
concerns are compounded by the politicization of our university
environment, in which the ideals of an academic environment are being
traded for the very different ideals of a corporate environment. This
climate of fear is having a chilling effect on our university.
Motion: West Virginia University shall establish an external review
panel to whom faculty, staff and students can confidentially report
their concerns regarding harassment, retribution, or employment status
that are related to opinions they have expressed about the current
university administration. Within 90 days of its creation, this panel
shall provide a statement indicating the extent of the reported
concerns, as well as a recommendation whether the panel should continue
in its monitoring activities.
Motion #5 Submitted by Stephen McClusky ,
Stephen.McClusky@mail.wvu.edu
Procedures for Selecting the Officers of West Virginia University
University (n): The whole body of teachers and scholars engaged, at a
particular place, in giving and receiving instruction in the higher
branches of learning; such persons associated together as a society or
corporate body, with definite organization and acknowledged powers and
privileges (esp. that of conferring degrees), and forming an institution
for the promotion of education in the higher or more important branches
of learning…. Oxford English Dictionary
Whereas, one of the historical powers and privileges of a university
has been the selection of its officers, and
Whereas, it is necessary that, to be effective, the officers appointed
to manage divisions of the university must have the respect of both the
superiors to whom they report and the faculty of the division which they
manage, and
Whereas, it is desirable that searches to fill such academic /
administrative positions be conducted in an open and transparent manner,
and
Whereas, it is customary practice at West Virginia University that
appointments of department chairs have the consent of both the relevant
department and the dean of the relevant college,
Therefore, the Faculty Assembly adopts the following procedures to fill
any vacancies in academic / administrative positions (including, but not
limited to, department chairs, deans of the various colleges, the
provost, and the president of the university).
There shall be an open search conducted by a search committee, the
majority of whose members will be faculty of the relevant division of
the university. (In the case of department chairs the search may be
conducted by the department acting as a search committee).
After interviewing a short list of candidates, the search committee
shall recommend suitable candidates to the immediate superior to whom
the selected person reports and to the faculty of the relevant division
for approval. (In the case of officers of the entire university, the
Faculty Senate shall represent the faculty; in the case of the President
of the University, the immediate superior is the Board of Governors) If
the immediate superior and the relevant faculty cannot agree on one or
more acceptable candidates, the search will be reopened until acceptable
candidates are approved.
The immediate superior shall then fill the position from among the
approved candidates.
Motion #6 Submitted by:
Timothy Warner, ECAS Tim.Warner@mail.wvu.edu 3-4725
Greg Elmes, ECAS, Greg.Elmes@mail.wvu.edu 3-4685
My proposed motion:
BACKGROUND:
The current crisis over the eMBA degree to Heather Bresch is
fundamentally a product of the power structure of the institution. The
group with ultimate responsibility for West Virginia University policy
and for hiring and firing the University President is the WVU Board of
Governors (BOG). The WVU BOG comprises 18 people, 12 of whom are
appointed by the Governor of West Virginia. The remaining six comprise:
1 faculty member, 1 student, 1 classified staff member, and the
chairpersons of the Board of Advisors or Visitors of WVU at Parkersburg,
the WVU Institute of Technology, and the Community and Technical College
at the WVU Institute of Technology. The alumni have no direct voice in
the BOG. Specific details on the BOG can be found at:
http://bog.wvu.edu/procedures
The Heather Bresch affair demonstrates the danger of having so much
power over the institution in hands of one person, in this case the
State Governor. This concentration of power has inevitably led to the
politicization of WVU via the appointments made to the Board. In order
to ensure long lasting, structural changes, and to broaden the vision of
the university’s governing body, it will be necessary to change the
makeup of the BOG, and ensure representation of a wider range of
voices.
MOTION: The Faculty Assembly requests that the West Virginia State
Legislature change the number and method of appointments to the WVU
Board of Governors (BOG). We request specifically that the number of
governor’s appointees should be reduced in favor of positions to be
allocated to elected representatives of the alumni. The proportion of
faculty, student and staff representatives should be maintained.
May 13, 2008 at 2:35 pm
By laws of Faculty Senate relative to University Assembly:
“3. Regular Meetings
The University Assembly shall hold one regular meeting during each academic year (typically on the second Monday of October) at which time the President shall report in detail on the state of the University. The President may make such recommendations to the University Assembly
and call such problems to their attention as the President deems pertinent to its responsibility as a faculty. There shall be free discussion of any subject relating to the policy or administration of the University until such time as a majority of the members present pass a motion to adjourn.
4. Special Meetings
Special meetings of the University Assembly may be called by the President of the University or the Faculty Senate Chair or by petition to the Faculty Senate Office of five percent of the members of the University Assembly.
5. Presiding Officer
The Chair of the Faculty Senate shall serve as the Chair of Faculty and shall preside over the University Assembly. In his/her absence, the Faculty Senate Chair-Elect shall preside.
6. Parliamentarian
The Senate Parliamentarian shall serve as the Parliamentarian of the University Assembly.
7. Notice of Meetings
Except in case of an emergency, the Faculty Senate Office shall notify members of the University Assembly at least one week in advance of the date of a regular or special meeting.
8. Procedural Rules
Meetings of the University Assembly shall be conducted according to Robert’s Rules of Order.”
There is no quorum requirement. It takes a majority of those present to vote to adjourn. Is it reasonable to infer that a vote by a majority of those present will carry a motion?
May 13, 2008 at 2:36 pm
Re the post from Garrison must go: Here are the six motions. As you will see, the one from Dallas Branch in Phys Ed (#2) is about intimidation & was seconded by Famouri
Motion #1 from Sherman D. Riemenschneider (ECAS) and Katy Ryan (ECAS)
for consideration at the Faculty Assembly on May 14, 2008:
Sherm.Riemenschneider@mail.wvu.edu 3-2011 x2322
kohearnr@mail.wvu.edu 3-9729
The Faculty Assembly of West Virginia University concurs with the
Riemenschneider/Ryan motion that was passed by the Faculty Senate on May
5, 2008.
_______________________________
Text of the motion from Sherman D. Riemenschneider (senator from ECAS)
and Katy Ryan (senator from ECAS) passed by the WVU Faculty Senate on
May 5, 2008:
Sherm.Riemenschneider@mail.wvu.edu 3-2011 x2322
kohearnr@mail.wvu.edu 3-9729
The award of an unearned eMBA degree to Heather Bresch has called the
academic integrity of West Virginia University into serious question and
has led to unprecedented public outrage and embarrassment to WVU.
President Mike Garrison assigned his senior advisors to participate in
the deliberations that led to this award. The extent of his subsequent
personal involvement in or knowledge of this award is the subject of
widespread speculation fueled by his perceived lack of candor and the
unusual manner in which these deliberations were carried out.
This speculation has shaken confidence in his leadership. Calls for
his resignation are emanating from faculty, students, and alumni in all
parts of the country. WVU donors have rescinded major contributions
pending his removal from office. Critical and derisive press coverage
has appeared around the globe. We have never seen the WVU community so
divided, so afraid, and so deeply troubled.
As President of WVU, Mike Garrison bears a unique responsibility to act
in the best interests of the University. Regardless of the extent of
his direct involvement, the highly publicized award of an unearned eMBA
under his watch has damaged his effectiveness and his credibility as
President. We doubt that WVU will be able to restore its reputation and
its academic integrity under his leadership.
MOTION: The Faculty Senate of West Virginia University votes no
confidence in President Mike Garrison. For the good of the institution
and for the benefit of our students, he must resign or the Board of
Governors must require his resignation.
Motion #2 from Dallas Branch, School of Physical Education
dbranch@wvu.edu 293-3295 x 5264
Second to the Motion:
Parviz Famouri, College of Engineering & Mineral Resources
pfamouri@wvu.edu 293-0405 x 2530
Article II of the WVU Faculty Constitution states, “The Senate shall
have authority, as the recognized body representing faculty, to
recommend general policies to the President and the governing and policy
boards with regard to :
5.e. Responsibilities, rights, and duties of faculty members, such as
standards of appointments and conduct…on all matters of faculty
welfare…;
Motion:
Be it resolved that the West Virginia University Faculty Senate
recommends that any faculty member found responsible for intimidating,
coercive, and/or threatening language, behavior, correspondence, or
postings will be subject to immediate disciplinary action including
dismissal. This includes, but is not limited to, specific “death threats
made against another University employee, governing board member, or
State of West Virginia executive”.
Submitted for consideration on Sunday, May 12 at 10:40 a.m.
Motion #3 Sponsors:
Prof. Adam Komisaruk, Department of English, akomisar@wvu.edu
Prof. Linda Shuster, Dept. of Speech Pathology & Audiology,
lshuster@wvu.edu
Since July 1, 2001, the West Virginia University Board of Governors has
been the sole governing body for WVU and its affiliated campuses. The
Board comprises the following members (WVU BOG Operating Procedures,
Articles 1.2-1.3, http://bog.wvu.edu/procedures):
. “one full-time member of the faculty with the rank of instructor or
above duly elected by the faculty [2-year term, renewable for “three
additional terms, not to exceed a total of eight consecutive years”];
. “one member of the student body in good academic standing, enrolled
for college credit work and duly elected by the student body [1-year
term];
. “one member of the institutional classified employees duly elected
by the classified employees [2-year term, renewable for “three
additional terms, not to exceed a total of eight consecutive years”];
. “the chairpersons of the institutional Boards of Advisors of the
Community and Technical College at West Virginia University Institute of
Technology and of West Virginia University at Parkersburg [2-year
terms];
. “the chairperson of the Board of Visitors at West Virginia
University Institute of Technology [2-year term];
. “and twelve lay members appointed by the governor with the advice
and consent of the Senate [4-year staggered terms, renewable for one
additional term].”
The BOG thus accords a minority voice to the constituencies directly
bound by its actions. Duly elected agents of the faculty, staff and
students of WVU are outnumbered by political appointees 12 to 6. Such
an arrangement compromises the responsiveness of the BOG to the
interests of the WVU community. The controversy involving the award of
an eMBA degree to Heather Bresch has badly shaken the confidence of that
community in the integrity of its own governance. To restore this
confidence, the time has come to explore systemic reforms to the BOG.
Strategies might include, but are not limited to, increasing the ratio
of elected to unelected members; increasing the ratio of faculty, staff
and/or student members to lay members; creating seats for labor and/or
academic representatives external to WVU. The gravity of this task
demands the involvement of all parties with a stake in WVU, culminating
if appropriate in legislative action.
MOTION: We, the faculty, call for a re-evaluation of the composition
of the WVU Board of Governors, with a view to increasing its
transparency, representativeness and accountability.
Motion #4 from:
Bill Wonderlin
Associate Professor
Department of Biochemistry
WVU Health Sciences Center
wwonderlin@hsc.wvu.edu, 293-3159
Seconded by:
Judith A. Sedgeman, EdD
Education Director
West Virginia Initiative for Innate Health
at the Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center
jsedgeman@hsc.wvu.edu
Michael R. Miller
Professor
Department of Biochemistry
WVU Health Sciences Center
mmiller@hsc.wvu.edu
————————————
The foundation of a university’s activities is the guarantee that all
faculty and students can engage in free speech without fear of
harassment or retribution for the positions that they may advocate. This
freedom of expression should encompass not only the traditional academic
environment of the classroom, but also the broader activities of our
university community, including the opinions faculty and students might
wish to express about the activities of the university administration.
However, there is growing concern on the campus of West Virginia
University that criticism of President Garrison and his administration
may lead to harassment, retribution, or even loss of employment. These
concerns are compounded by the politicization of our university
environment, in which the ideals of an academic environment are being
traded for the very different ideals of a corporate environment. This
climate of fear is having a chilling effect on our university.
Motion: West Virginia University shall establish an external review
panel to whom faculty, staff and students can confidentially report
their concerns regarding harassment, retribution, or employment status
that are related to opinions they have expressed about the current
university administration. Within 90 days of its creation, this panel
shall provide a statement indicating the extent of the reported
concerns, as well as a recommendation whether the panel should continue
in its monitoring activities.
Motion #5 Submitted by Stephen McClusky ,
Stephen.McClusky@mail.wvu.edu
Procedures for Selecting the Officers of West Virginia University
University (n): The whole body of teachers and scholars engaged, at a
particular place, in giving and receiving instruction in the higher
branches of learning; such persons associated together as a society or
corporate body, with definite organization and acknowledged powers and
privileges (esp. that of conferring degrees), and forming an institution
for the promotion of education in the higher or more important branches
of learning…. Oxford English Dictionary
Whereas, one of the historical powers and privileges of a university
has been the selection of its officers, and
Whereas, it is necessary that, to be effective, the officers appointed
to manage divisions of the university must have the respect of both the
superiors to whom they report and the faculty of the division which they
manage, and
Whereas, it is desirable that searches to fill such academic /
administrative positions be conducted in an open and transparent manner,
and
Whereas, it is customary practice at West Virginia University that
appointments of department chairs have the consent of both the relevant
department and the dean of the relevant college,
Therefore, the Faculty Assembly adopts the following procedures to fill
any vacancies in academic / administrative positions (including, but not
limited to, department chairs, deans of the various colleges, the
provost, and the president of the university).
There shall be an open search conducted by a search committee, the
majority of whose members will be faculty of the relevant division of
the university. (In the case of department chairs the search may be
conducted by the department acting as a search committee).
After interviewing a short list of candidates, the search committee
shall recommend suitable candidates to the immediate superior to whom
the selected person reports and to the faculty of the relevant division
for approval. (In the case of officers of the entire university, the
Faculty Senate shall represent the faculty; in the case of the President
of the University, the immediate superior is the Board of Governors) If
the immediate superior and the relevant faculty cannot agree on one or
more acceptable candidates, the search will be reopened until acceptable
candidates are approved.
The immediate superior shall then fill the position from among the
approved candidates.
Motion #6 Submitted by:
Timothy Warner, ECAS Tim.Warner@mail.wvu.edu 3-4725
Greg Elmes, ECAS, Greg.Elmes@mail.wvu.edu 3-4685
My proposed motion:
BACKGROUND:
The current crisis over the eMBA degree to Heather Bresch is
fundamentally a product of the power structure of the institution. The
group with ultimate responsibility for West Virginia University policy
and for hiring and firing the University President is the WVU Board of
Governors (BOG). The WVU BOG comprises 18 people, 12 of whom are
appointed by the Governor of West Virginia. The remaining six comprise:
1 faculty member, 1 student, 1 classified staff member, and the
chairpersons of the Board of Advisors or Visitors of WVU at Parkersburg,
the WVU Institute of Technology, and the Community and Technical College
at the WVU Institute of Technology. The alumni have no direct voice in
the BOG. Specific details on the BOG can be found at:
http://bog.wvu.edu/procedures
The Heather Bresch affair demonstrates the danger of having so much
power over the institution in hands of one person, in this case the
State Governor. This concentration of power has inevitably led to the
politicization of WVU via the appointments made to the Board. In order
to ensure long lasting, structural changes, and to broaden the vision of
the university’s governing body, it will be necessary to change the
makeup of the BOG, and ensure representation of a wider range of
voices.
MOTION: The Faculty Assembly requests that the West Virginia State
Legislature change the number and method of appointments to the WVU
Board of Governors (BOG). We request specifically that the number of
governor’s appointees should be reduced in favor of positions to be
allocated to elected representatives of the alumni. The proportion of
faculty, student and staff representatives should be maintained.
May 13, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Here are the six motions to be considered at the Assembly:
MOTION 1: The Faculty Senate of West Virginia University votes no
confidence in President Mike Garrison. For the good of the institution
and for the benefit of our students, he must resign or the Board of
Governors must require his resignation.
MOTION 2:
Be it resolved that the West Virginia University Faculty Senate
recommends that any faculty member found responsible for intimidating,
coercive, and/or threatening language, behavior, correspondence, or
postings will be subject to immediate disciplinary action including
dismissal. This includes, but is not limited to, specific “death threats
made against another University employee, governing board member, or
State of West Virginia executive”.
MOTION 3: We, the faculty, call for a re-evaluation of the composition
of the WVU Board of Governors, with a view to increasing its
transparency, representativeness and accountability.
MOTION 4: West Virginia University shall establish an external review
panel to whom faculty, staff and students can confidentially report
their concerns regarding harassment, retribution, or employment status
that are related to opinions they have expressed about the current
university administration. Within 90 days of its creation, this panel
shall provide a statement indicating the extent of the reported
concerns, as well as a recommendation whether the panel should continue
in its monitoring activities.
MOTION 5…..Therefore, the Faculty Assembly adopts the following procedures to fill
any vacancies in academic / administrative positions (including, but not
limited to, department chairs, deans of the various colleges, the
provost, and the president of the university).
There shall be an open search conducted by a search committee, the
majority of whose members will be faculty of the relevant division of
the university. (In the case of department chairs the search may be
conducted by the department acting as a search committee).
After interviewing a short list of candidates, the search committee
shall recommend suitable candidates to the immediate superior to whom
the selected person reports and to the faculty of the relevant division
for approval. (In the case of officers of the entire university, the
Faculty Senate shall represent the faculty; in the case of the President
of the University, the immediate superior is the Board of Governors) If
the immediate superior and the relevant faculty cannot agree on one or
more acceptable candidates, the search will be reopened until acceptable
candidates are approved.
The immediate superior shall then fill the position from among the
approved candidates.
MOTION 6: The Faculty Assembly requests that the West Virginia State
Legislature change the number and method of appointments to the WVU
Board of Governors (BOG). We request specifically that the number of
governor’s appointees should be reduced in favor of positions to be
allocated to elected representatives of the alumni. The proportion of
faculty, student and staff representatives should be maintained.
May 13, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Another large group of WVU faculty are the approximately 150 Extension agents and specialists who are all over the state. Most of them will not be able to get to the meeting either.
May 13, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Regarding the comment from “Garrison must go” the motion from Phys Ed prof Dallas Branch is #2 in the list of six motions above. Thus, if he is the one that Hoppy interviewed something fishy is going on.
May 13, 2008 at 2:47 pm
link from garrisonmustgo regarding intimidation of students mentioned in the DP article: http://garrisonmustgo.com/?p=40 — apparently a BOG members is conveying the message, indirectly, that students will never work in WV if they keep speaking out against Garrison.
May 13, 2008 at 2:48 pm
oops - should be a BOG member
May 13, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Dallas Branch is BFF with Craig Walker
May 13, 2008 at 2:52 pm
FYI
Motion 1 is Sherm Riemenschneider & Katy Ryan;
Motion 2 is Dallas Branch, seconded by Parviz Famouri;
Motion 3 is Adam Komisaruk & Linda Shuster;
Motion 4 is Bill Wonderlin, second Judith Sedgeman;
Motion 5: Stephen McClusky
Motion 6: Timothy Warner, Greg Elmes
May 13, 2008 at 2:58 pm
Quick read suggest that Branch is disgruntled and has an axe to grind vis a vis academic types:
http://www.state.wv.us/admin/grievanc/decision/dec2007/branch.htm
May 13, 2008 at 3:06 pm
And he was repped by Alex Shook, D, House of Delegates.
Part of the machine.
May 13, 2008 at 3:08 pm
And just like Huggy got a shiny new contract in a lame attempt to bolster Garrison, and deflect attention, WVU also released all of Roots’ deposition today also.
Funny. They can’t wait to release depositions of coaches and peeps in the Roots fiasco.
But can’t be bothered to release their own phone records.
May 13, 2008 at 3:08 pm
Clearly he is one to take us to the next level under Garrison’s rule.
May 13, 2008 at 3:39 pm
No where in the WVU faculty senate constitution (http://www.facultysenate.wvu.edu/Constitution%2010-14-02.pdf) does it say that a ‘quorum’ has to be present. It says the assembly should be conducted by “Roberts Rules of Order”. That’s all. NOTHING in this document indicates that ‘700 or more faculty’ have to be in attendance for this ‘to count’ as some blogged in.
We need as many as possible, but for someone to arbitrarily set the bar at 700 for this meeting ‘to count’ is wrong.
May 13, 2008 at 3:58 pm
The “quorum” bullshit is pure misdirection designed to keep you from attending the meeting and voting.
Or at least that’s how I’m treating it.
So please let it go.
May 13, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Stay focused on the goal. Garrison must go. That is the main focus of tomorrow’s assembly. Ignore the red herrings about quorums. Take the afternoon off to attend the assembly. Stand up & be counted. We can do it! Remember the Fiesta Bowl when we had been counted out because Coach Rod left us at the altar? Be like Owen Schmitt–put your head down and run for the goal!
May 13, 2008 at 4:02 pm
You got it HK!! Too bad it was on the radio. Can the MIR folks issue a press release to counteract this misinformation?
May 13, 2008 at 4:12 pm
Fox Hunter says it all - your goal is to get rid of Garrison. And then what?
How about greater faculty governance and empowerment? How about transforming WVU into a better place to work where faculty and staff are more respected? How about an historical analysis of how severely faculty and staff were marginalized during the previous 12 years and before Garrison even arrived on campus?
What I read here is a politics of anger and frustration and not a politics of institutional transformation.
May 13, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Concerned: Next on the agenda are exactly the things you point out, see motions above in comment from wvu faculty. Don’t get me wrong, Garrison’s ouster is just the first thing, not the only thing.
May 13, 2008 at 4:48 pm
Fox Hunter - Can there be a legitimate debate about whether Garrison must go to get there?
This is where I part company with this crowd. I think he is actually very supportive of faculty and never had a chance to demonstrate this, although he did get us a day care center after decades of DOA and fought hard for faculty raises even when members of the previous administration opposed it. Garrison has never had a chance to lead this institution in ways that he wanted to. He has never been in full control.
Remember the various forums when he arrived. That was so healthy and unusual here at WVU.
May 13, 2008 at 4:59 pm
if anyone has that list of 500 business folks who signed that letter of support for MG please let us know who they are and what business they are from so i can start spending my money elsewhere ! if the faculty and staff boycott their business they will be cirppled by the economic impact and then we will see who is supporting MG.
May 13, 2008 at 5:05 pm
concerned –
You should expect significant incoming vitriol and I am obliged to start.
Garrison had his chance in October when his “friend” princess Heather called him. He knew before that she didn’t have her degree, he knew then she didn’t have her degree and he knows now she did not earn her degree. At that point it was his job to lead WVU and he failed.
HK is righteous in his commentary.
May 13, 2008 at 5:06 pm
The forums when he was hired were healthy? Healthy in a “we the search committee know what’s best for the university, and fuck everyone else” kind of way?
http://wvpoliticalsweatbox.blogspot.com/2007/03/uhhhhhhhhh-mr-garrison-i-have-just-one.html
May 13, 2008 at 5:11 pm
A daycare center?
So-called forums?
A pay raise that was in the works months before Garrison was on the job?
This guy has made WVU the laughing stock of the entire academic world — literally. But it’s all good because he had a meet n’ great with you and your buddies?
It’s really sad how little it takes to buy some people off.
May 13, 2008 at 5:13 pm
I’ll be there tomorrow, voting to oust Garrison AND to change the system that put him in power. The official calendar of university events refused to post information about the Faculty Assembly on the WVU website. Terrified that people will show up at the right place, the right time.
May 13, 2008 at 5:15 pm
Concerned: I see your point. And, if the Bresch affair had not occurred, I think many faculty would be willing to give the guy a chance even though there wasn’t support from the faculty senate when he was appointed. However, with the Bresch affair, he has demonstrated that he is at best woefully inadequate/inexperienced (not knowing that having his staff at the degree meetings was a mistake, duh) or at worst arrogant (thinking he can give a degree to the gov’s daughter & get away with it). I am not buying the idea that he is just a nice guy trying to do the best job possible who is caught in the cross fire. The connections between him & the Manchins going back to high school, working as a lobbyist etc is just a little too cozy/coincidental for me to get on board with that idea. It could be argued that Jerry Lang did a lot of good for the university too–witness the improvements to the library and other infrastructure etc. Nobody is arguing that he should not have resigned. I agree that Garrison has done some good things for the university. Unfortunately, they are overshadowed by the negative attention he has brought to WVU and WV via his incompetence. The only way to move past it is for him to go. Stanford presidents knew this, Harvard presidents knew this….if MG wasn’t still wet behind the ears he would have realized it sooner too. If he really loves WVU as much as he says he does, he will move on.
May 13, 2008 at 5:17 pm
Left Shadow - you seem to know a lot about what happened. So please tell us more about how Garrison and his rookie team got Lang and Sears to make this decision. That part of the story has yet to be told.
And please explain why Lang approved this, even though he was very angry and hostile at that time about being passed over as WVU President.
May 13, 2008 at 5:22 pm
Ok, so someone has redirected the “Academic Integrity” page to the only slightly related “Rights” page, and “File Not Found” doesn’t occur if you do what I described above anymore. (But it still does if you go directly to the old link, http://www.arc.wvu.edu/admissions/integrity.html). However, some Googling reveals many other WVU pages that still point to the nonexistent page.
When the easy link to something like the academic integrity policy is broken in times like these, it makes *me* want to read it.
You can too by going to the catalogs at http://coursecatalog.wvu.edu/ and reading the PDF for the topic “General Info”. Some interesting things are there.
First, the first sentence (using my older paper copy of the graduate catalog, but maybe the same) is “The academic development of students and the overall integrity of the institution are primary responsibilities of WVU.” Nothing there about pay raises or day care facilities, it turns out. It goes on: “Academic dishonesty … [creates] … an atmosphere of mistrust, disrespect, and insecurity.” Check. “In addition, it is essential in an academic community that grades accurately reflect the attainment of the individual student. Faculty, students, and administrators have shared responsibilities in maintaining the academic integrity essential for the University to accomplish its mission.” Perhaps that’s why the link was clipped.
Much emphasis is on student cheating, which comes in three kinds. 1. Plagiarism; 2. Cheating and dishonest practices; and 3. Forgery, misrepresentation, or fraud. This third category includes the relevant cases for, say, altering grade slips and giving away an unearned degree. It includes:
“a. Forging or altering, or causing to be altered, the record of any grade in a grade book or other educational record.
b. Use of University documents or instruments of identification with intent to defraud
…
f. Knowingly furnishing false statements in any University academic proceeding.”
Then there is an elaborate procedure for handling it properly with various steps and appeals, so that mistakes aren’t made and charges and claims are documented. If all the steps are followed sequentially, one would finally end up at “President’s Level,” wherein the president or the “president’s designee” can decide whether or not to hear the appeal. The president’s (or, again, the president’s designee’s) decision is final.
This whole issue, to me, is about integrity. Not pay raises, not who’s willing to work with whom, not blind loyalty to the institution, not who’s directly implicated by name in the narrowest reading of the report. The report was devastating to Garrison, and unless you’re blinded by some conflict of interest or completely unaware of how universities work, I don’t see how you can’t be calling for him to resign.
May 13, 2008 at 5:22 pm
The public statements made by Garrison and his cronies; the work done by the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, and the Report all come together to paint a very, VERY ugly picture.
So with all due respect Mr. Concerned, I don’t think we have to explain jack shit to you.
Please quit pretending that you’re taking the high road.
We are SICK AND TIRED of being lied to OVER AND OVER AGAIN, period. So don’t be surprised if you get flamed for asking us to bend over and keep on taking it.
May 13, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Concerned: I don’t know how that happened either. It is a mystery to me too. However, lets imagine that Lang turns it over to the college of biz (who just coincidentally has a big benefactor named PUSHKAR)….In fact, we do not have to imagine this at all, this is exactly what Lang reported that he did. The COB comes up with the answer Mylan wants to hear, the answer Garrison & co wants to hear…why would Lang to go against the prevailing sentiment? Plenty of research shows that in crisis situations people turn to others they think have the right info, in this case, the COB.
May 13, 2008 at 5:28 pm
It’s cool. I can handle it. BUT, there are things that people think they know and its just not that simple. And a Pittsburgh paper driving a WV narrative. Ouch!
We do agree that institutional lying should not be accepted but I do not believe in public lynchings based on partial information. That is certainly not ‘progressive’ politics.
May 13, 2008 at 5:32 pm
Lynching? Calm down, dude.
And “Pittsburgh paper driving a WV narrative?” Uh, last I checked, the woman at the center of this story is the COO of a Pittsburgh company, and a resident of the area. So stop that “foreign paper” crap right now.
And this isn’t about progressive politics — it’s about accountability.
May 13, 2008 at 5:43 pm
genie barnhart, the organizer of the morgantown petition is a close friend of Doug Kirby, Heather Bresch’s ex husband. Her daughter is also very close with Heather’s daughter Kelsey. Barnhart is a realtor and apparently landlord who would obviously benefit from increased enrollment. I’m working on getting the 500 supporters.
May 13, 2008 at 5:50 pm
hmm, I need to stop that right now - that is a great way to have a conversation! Do you only want people who agree with you to blog?
And fox hunter - maybe GL wanted to damage MG! SS did not make this call. No Dean made important decisions without GL approval.
May 13, 2008 at 5:53 pm
There’s a name for this sort of thing:
Concern Troll
May 13, 2008 at 5:56 pm
If I were a Garrison ass-licker at WVU right now, I’d be “concerned” too. Right now you’re just a whore. But if Garrison goes, you’ll be a whore with no big boyfriend to protect you from the people who kept their integrity despite what Garrison was offering.
I’ve been wondering when the Garrison trolls were going to surface on this blog again. You’re walking right through the assigned talking points: Lang did it all himself (for no reason except a burning desire to ruin his academic reputation in every corner of the world, as a sort of masochistic retirement gift to himself), Garrison loves the faculty, daycare center, Pittsburgh paper.
Are you aware Mylan is a Pittsburgh company? And are you saying the out-of-state (and therefore necessarily evil) Post-Gazette is printing made-up news as part of a diabolical plot to destroy WVU by driving out its daycare-delivering president?
You also trot out my favorite ploy of the Garrison trolls: ok Mr. Left Shadow, if you know so much, tell me who you are (so Garrison’s boys can hurry over and break your legs). Let’s try this: concerned, tell us how you know so goddamn much about the politics in Stewart Hall.
Finally, what the fuck do you mean by “He has never been in full control”?
May 13, 2008 at 6:00 pm
so, another person now uses the name concerned - very clever way to get me off this blog. It worked. Goodbye.
Cutting off real debate is very sad.
I tried.
May 13, 2008 at 6:01 pm
Genie Barnhert is also a close friend of the Petropolus family
May 13, 2008 at 6:03 pm
OK…try this for progressive….MG wants to put the touted daycare center in a neighborhood that does not want it…response…We are WVU, get over it !! (ok, I exaggerate a little, but not much). Look, concerned, you can put your head in the sand; or try this not so subtle disguise of yours, but I have lived in Morgantown for over 30 years now and this crew is the absolute worst!! MG is supported by a bunch of guys that are multi-zillionaires and yet take tax payers money in development grants to suck at the public tit. Or, are supported by local developers that get sweetheart deals in land concessions. Now, the faculty and the WVU community have a differents set of concerns/bitches, but I am a local and have a list of atrocities concerning Garrison and Co.
But the issue is still integrety, whether dealing with a local neighbohood associations, or wielding an iron fist (economically), or just a lack of vision regarding the integration of townies/gownies.
I realize these tensions will always exist to a large degree, and quite honestly I am sure that this seems like pothole issues in this context of largely high altitude discourse, but I can assure you and this entire board, that it is of major concern to “us”. Sorta like the East End Association vs the Mansion (or in cahoots sometimes).
One thing, other than just the pure blood sport of this debacle, the MG Affair has focused a great deal of attention to issues and demanding more transparency of WVU leadership than ever ! And we here in Morgantown are perversely grateful for that. I know John Fleming would have appreciated is scrutiny alot sooner…
Just my two cents worth…ok, ok, I am sure I have more cents than that.
:)
May 13, 2008 at 6:08 pm
concerned —
Put down that crack pipe and get your ass down to the meth clinic now. You need help.
BTW, before you go, what do you mean by “BUT, there are things that people think they know and its just not that simple.”?
May 13, 2008 at 6:19 pm
When he said “he didn’t understand tenure” that pretty much sealed the deal.
Nobody with half a brain, can argue he’s fit for the job, when almost a year into the job, he doesn’t understand tenure.
Unless that person is sucking his dick.
May 13, 2008 at 6:26 pm
Is that guy for real? He’s quitting already, just because someone else used “concerned”? Don’t go yet, “concerned”—we can tell you from the ot