Me Link You Long Time

A Carnegie Mellon study ranks Don Surber as the internet’s number 2 most informative blog?

Why yes. Instapundit is number 1 of course, Michelle Malkin is number 5 and the widely read Boing Boing is number 9. Liberal Atrios doesn’t show up until number 10.

Keep reading.

First, a word on conservative blogs:

1. By and large, they’re shamelessly self-referential link whores. Now liberal bloggers link to each other too, but conservatives elevate it to the level of Olympic sport. If there’s one thing conservative bloggers love more than Ronald Reagan, it’s linking to other conservative blogs. If Michelle Malkin farts in the shower, Don Surber links to a story about it. Then Instapundit links to Don Surber’s link. Then Michelle Malkin links to Don Surber’s link to Instapundit linking to Don Surber. And so on. If you don’t believe me, spend some time reading Surber’s blog. You’ll notice a pattern. I have no doubt that Don Surber lays awake a night thinking of excuses to link to Instapundit.

Now this would just be trivial if it weren’t for…

2. Conservative bloggers just make shit up. All the time. A carry over from talk radio, I guess. Like Don “Canada’s violent crime rate twice is ours” Surber. (I would link to his original post, but it’s mysteriously 404.) They’ll link to anything and everything that supports their argument without giving a second though to whether it’s true or not. So what happens is a lesser know blogger publishes a total falsehood. Then Surber links to it. Then one of Surber’s minions (or Surbots, as I call them) links to his story. Then others. And eventually it’s approvingly linked by the motherload of conservative traffic, Instapundit (and why wouldn’t he, since Surber links to him all the time too). And before you know it, thousands of little dittoheads are running around thinking that Canada’s violent crime rate really is double ours. If you search around you can find several awful examples of this kind of thing happening over and over, most recently with the Frost family and SCHIP. It boggles the mind.

But what doesn’t boggle the mind is how Surber’s blog, and conservative bloggers in general ranked highest in this study. It’s actually a study of Cost-Effective Outbreak Detection in Networks — like how to best detect an outbreak of something, like cholera, spreading though a network, like a city water supply. The researchers applied that same algorithm to blogs, to answer the question “Which blogs should one read to be most up to date, i.e., to quickly know about important stories that propagate over the blogosphere?” The methodology favored blogs that link to other blogs, and that other blogs frequently link to. There was no way to measure if any of the stories these blogs linked to were like, actually true. So naturally, conservative bullshit clearinghouses like Instapundit, Malkin, and our own Don Surber ranked highest.

That’s right folks: a heroically ignorant douche-nozzle like Don Surber can publish a complete and utter falsehood, and it will spread through conservative channels just like a disease.

Is it 5 o’ clock yet?

17 Responses to “Me Link You Long Time”

  1. Raging Red Says:

    So Don Surber’s like a staff infection?

  2. Lawbot Says:

    I think the authors were trying to approximate Google’s algorithm. Consequently, the study results were a lot like Google results: generally trash. Speaking of, this morning, Google AdBot decided to send me some links to “Oh No - I’m Emo!” and “Irreverent Underpants.”

  3. Bill Lynch Says:

    So, I should lie a lot and people will read that? Fuck… I thought it was the swearing that got people hot.

  4. demosthenes.or.locke Says:

    HK, you guys like to the surbmeister pretty often…

    its possible you contributed to this

  5. Jay Says:

    I may be misguided here, but I think more national exposure will hasten his departure. When he was on Charles Adler he laid down like a good doggie when challenged. Surber can’t hack it on his own and it seems at some point Betty or someone with a little pride would get tired of one of their own being shown, nationwide, to be lazy and incompetent.

  6. Jay Says:

    And speaking of Malkin, I can’t stop laughing at this picture. It looks like they had to evict a hobo to get their podium back.

  7. fascismisdead Says:

    Isn’t it time that we do away with the term “Conservative” once and for all? Conservatives were honorable people. These mortarforkers are anything but honorable. They are right wingers pure and simple……..or simplistic.

    If anyone has ever seen the slutty Malkin, now re-virginified like most of those right wing dry cows, in one of her foaming-at-the-mouth rants, you see the face of the new Nazis in America.

    Hopefully the American flirtation with official hatred will be rectified in the next election.

  8. M. Says:

    Fascism…,

    Please. If you think FDR, Kennedy, or maybe even Clinton would recognize today’s shrill reactionary victimitis as liberalism, get back to me. Both sides of the aisle have attained an unprecedented level of horridness.

  9. fascismisdead Says:

    M.,

    In the perpetual state of confusion that I generally find myself, the combination of “shrill reactionary” and “victimitis” befogs me more than ever.

    I think I know what a “shrill reacrtionary” is but I don’t know the term “victimitis”, although I might.

    Combining the two oxymoronic terms seems indecipherable.

    I’m working on “victimitis.” See if I have it right, please.

    In today’s lexicon/discourse I think “victimitis” is a disparaging way of telling someone to “sit down, shut up, and be thankful that your situation isn’t worse. Furthermore, we don’t believe you anyway.”

    Facts are, M, there ARE victims. Some unfortunate, some unwitting, most all undeserving.

    Maybe the soul of a culture or society is the willingness to apologize, rectify and to swear that it will never happen again.

    I worry that we’ve lost that.

    As far as the level of “horridness” on both sides of the aisle, I sense a version of Dr. Samuel Johnson’s famous but derisive observation that stated “Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.”

    In other words “We’re bad but so are you.”

    Like the term “victimitis”, I see “same level of horridness” as an attempt to find the lowest common denominator.

  10. dubvee95 Says:

    If moderator kitteh had fake glasses, he’d be Don.

    http://icanhascheezburger.com/2007/10/31/moderator-kitteh-disapproves-ur-submishinz/

  11. elvis drinkmo Says:

    I agree with both M and Fascismisdead. There is no liberal or conservative in today’s American politics. I mean when did conservative become “bankrupt the country on a losing war in order to spread democracy around the globe”? and when did liberal become “who is the most Christian and supportive of cutting all social programs (not that we’d ever touch all the money that goes to Military Industrial Complex)”?

    There is only one ideology that our politicians follow and it is called $$$$$.

  12. Hippie Killer Says:

    I agree to a very large degree. But while no one asked us what we thought about the whole deal, this is the system Amer’ca has chosen…to put up with. So we have to work the system we have, or change it — which I’m not holding my breath for.

    Yeah, they’re all sellouts, but they’ve sold out to very different factions. The candidates ARE different. Where we get into trouble is when voters say, “you know, there’s really no difference between candidate A and candidate B, so I’m going to vote for the one I want to drink Budwiser with.” That’s exactly what got us into this horrible fucking mess.

    Of course, when the media never talks about anything deeper than the candidate’s goddamn marriages, what should we expect?

  13. Jay Says:

    The media never offers substance because they are part of the consolidation of wealth and power. TimeWarnerSonyGEAOLFCCPundit.com. What do you expect? I also think a lot of journalists keep in the back of their mind, particularly after 9/11, that Ben Bradley said in retrospect he would not have run the Watergate stories.

    But the fact that the Evangelistas are losing influence with the GOP is a good sign and I think people who are truly conservative are realizing that the GOP ain’t, at the moment. The pendulum swings yet again.

    HK’s right in that getting the FCC, SCOTUS, MSHA, Interior, Justice, etc… is hugely important in ‘08 and not one Republican candidate will do that.

  14. Bill Lynch Says:

    Well, I kind of agree with Jay about the media, but that’s because I write a lot of stories about burned out rockstars.

    This is another reason why I don’t trust Moveon.org.

    And with the Republicans… I think they’re probably working on a stealth candidate. It doesn’t benefit them to have anyone out there right now. The Neocons don’t have a new message for people to rally around anyway. They’ll want someone who gets the nod from the evangelicals, the bean counters and the war mongers, but who looks like a complete outsider.

    None of the current guys doing tricks at parties fit that description. I think most of the current batch are probably just cannon fodder.

    The Democrats, who are not in power, don’t have that luxury… and they’re doomed.

  15. M. Says:

    Fascism…,

    Nice to see that you’ve read so much into my words. “We’re bad but so are you”? I studied literature, so I know the feeling: sometimes it’s a pain in the ass to get ten pages out of twenty-eight lines of Frost or Auden, so like you, my imagination tends to wander. Fair enough.

    Nonetheless, I am tired of the partisanship, and that was mainly my point: not some appeal to the “lowest common denominator.” Yes, there are victims, and yes, there are terrorists, but the left and right have taken these elements of life and turned them into vehicles for policy, and wrongly so, in my opinion. It is impossible for me to conceive of liberalism or conservatism as mental disorders, a la Limbaugh and Jon Stewart, and I think such an approach is unbelievably foolish.

    That is more what I was responding to from your first post: the idea that the “conservatives” of the War on Terror are representative of all conservatives is quite wrong.

  16. demosthenes.or.locke Says:

    These comments really suck. I read this blog because HK and the gang will take swipes at anybody who fucks up in this state even if they are tied into the democratic machine (See shit-eater just down the page)

    If I want to read a partisan blog I’ve got a lot of choices. If I want to read a funny, local, equal opportunity ballbuster, I come here.

    I blame surber’s rat bastard looking face.

  17. Jay Says:

    You’re all keeping up with the Sadly, No! Surber Spanking of the last few days, I hope.

Leave a Reply